Skip to content
Conference

Large-Scale Literature Review of AI Security and Governance Research from a Managerial Perspective

Sep 2026 · 6th Current Issues in Business and Economic Studies (CIBES) Conference – Abstract Book · 0 citations

TL;DR

A large-scale structured literature review combined with network-based bibliometric analysis is conducted to systematically examine how adversarial AI security is conceptualized and addressed within the broader AI governance and management perspective.

Abstract

The rapid deployment of AI systems across organizations has increased exposure to security risks, including adversarial attacks on machine learning models. Despite growing research on adversarial AI and AI governance, the literature remains fragmented across technical, policy and managerial domains. This study aims to systematically examine how adversarial AI security is conceptualized and addressed within the broader AI governance and management perspective. The objective is to identify dominant research streams, knowledge structures, and gaps in the integration of technical security insights into AI governance frameworks. This study conducts a large-scale structured literature review combined with network-based bibliometric analysis. A corpus of academic publications related to adversarial AI, machine learning security, and AI governance is collected using targeted keyword searches across major scholarly databases. The analysis maps relationships between papers, authors and key insights to dependency networks. Additionally, abstracts and referenced literature are examined using large language models (LLM) to identify conceptual orientations, research goals, and disciplinary influences within the field. The results reveal significant fragmentation between technical adversarial machine learning research and managerial AI governance practice. Technical studies primarily focus on model robustness and attack–defense mechanisms, while management-oriented research emphasizes regulatory compliance, risk management and organizational oversight. The citation network analysis shows limited cross-referencing between these communities, suggesting weak knowledge transfer across disciplines. The findings also identify a small number of bridging publications that connect technical security insights with AI governance and organizational perspectives. This study contributes to management and information systems research by providing a large-scale, network-based mapping of adversarial AI literature. By integrating bibliometric analysis with the use of LLM, the research highlights structural knowledge gaps that hinder effective organizational governance of AI security risks. The study offers a foundation for future interdisciplinary research and supports the development of more integrated governance frameworks addressing adversarial threats.

View source

Similar papers

#large language models Review Open access Sep 2026

Systemic Risks and Governance of Advanced Artificial Intelligence: A Structured Literature Review

A synthesized six-risk taxonomy; a four-level governance model spanning the individual, developer, state, and international levels; and a critical appraisal of the evidentiary basis for each risk claim suggest that dangerous outcomes are structurally plausible, though not inevitable, and that coordinated multilevel gov...

Joey O. Chua, E. Ayo, Josan D. Tamayo et al. · 0 citations
Aug 2026

AI Governance: Implications and Research Directions for Organization and Human Resource Management

This study examines the theoretical and empirical challenges that AI governance poses for the fields of organization studies and human resource management (HRM) and proposes directions for future research. As AI technologies rapidly diffuse across organizations, AI governance has emerged as a critical managerial con...

Sungjun Kim, Joonghak Lee · 0 citations
Review Open access Sep 2026

Artificial intelligence shaping ESG risk governance in banking: Evidence from a systematic literature review

The results indicate that strong governance arrangements, such as model governance, accountability frame­works, board supervision, and alignment with organizational risk appetite, are necessary for successfully deploying AI-enabled ESG.

Rini Marlina, Rosa Christiana Esti Noor Sumaryanti, Poltak Maruli John Liberty Hutagaol · 0 citations
#generative ai Review Sep 2026

Mapping the fragmented landscape of privacy in the age of generative AI: a bibliometric analysis and future research agenda

This study investigates how privacy has been conceptualized across technical, organizational, behavioral, ethical and governance perspectives and identifies key gaps and emerging challenges within the literature and contributes to the development of a more comprehensive perspective on privacy as a multidimensional issu...

Eya Kbaier · 0 citations
Conference Open access Aug 2026

Accountability Mechanisms in AI Projects: An Empirical Analysis of Governance, Performance Control, Delivery, and Misconduct Management

Artificial intelligence (AI) projects create significant opportunities but also raise complex accountability challenges due to system autonomy, opacity, and multi-stakeholder involvement. While accountability is widely recognized in AI governance, limited research has examined how it is operationalized within project e...

Gloria J. Miller · 0 citations

We use cookies to run the site and, with your consent, for analytics and to show ads. See our Cookie Policy.