Skip to content
Review Open access

Aspirin in Primary Prevention of CVD: A Pragmatic Outline and Advice for Treatment Personalization

Jul 2026 · Journal of Clinical Medicine · Vol 15, pp. 5936 · 0 citations · 39 references
Medicine

TL;DR

This narrative review and pragmatic clinical guide presents an illustrative tiered framework based on clinical, imaging, and biomarker markers—such as coronary artery calcium score, carotid plaque score, and lipoprotein(a)—to support individualized discussion of preventive aspirin therapy.

Abstract

Cardiovascular disease (CVD) remains the leading global cause of morbidity and mortality. While low-dose aspirin is well established for secondary prevention, its role in primary prevention is controversial because modest benefits in cardiovascular benefits must be balanced against increased bleeding risk, as highlighted by recent large trials. Current guidelines recommend restricting aspirin use to individuals at higher cardiovascular risk without elevated bleeding risk, yet significant heterogeneity persists in defining these thresholds. Evidence from randomized trials, guidelines, cohort and modeling analyses, and post hoc or observational subgroup studies suggests that selected patients with advanced subclinical atherosclerosis or specific high-risk markers may have a more favorable risk–benefit profile, although the certainty and directness of evidence vary across subgroups. This narrative review and pragmatic clinical guide presents an illustrative tiered framework based on clinical, imaging, and biomarker markers—such as coronary artery calcium score, carotid plaque score, and lipoprotein(a)—to support individualized discussion of preventive aspirin therapy. The framework is not a validated risk calculator or standalone treatment algorithm, and decisions should balance absolute cardiovascular risk, major bleeding risk, evidence certainty, and patient preferences.

Read PDF

Similar papers

Review Aug 2026

Coronary Artery Calcium-Guided Antiplatelet Therapy: What Does the Evidence Show?

The available evidence linking CAC burden to aspirin benefit is examined, the limitations of CAC-guided treatment decisions are discussed, and a practical framework that integrates ASCVD risk, bleeding risk, and patient-specific clinical factors is proposed.

Zachary C Ahart, Richard C. Becker · 0 citations
Review Open access Aug 2026

Beyond LDL-C: Modern Lipid Management for ASCVD Prevention in Primary Care

Treatment paradigms emphasize early intensification of therapy and addition of non-statin agents, and polygenic risk scoring and RNA-based therapies may offer opportunities to identify and treat those at highest residual risk.

Andrew Carlson, Zaid A. Zayyad, Stefanie Driesenga et al. · 0 citations
Open access Aug 2026

Triglyceride Polygenic Score Identifies Individuals Who May Respond Differently to Aspirin in Primary Prevention

The hypothesis‐generating findings suggest triglyceride‐related genetic variation may identify individuals with differential responses to aspirin, and suggest triglyceride‐related genetic variation may identify individuals with differential responses to aspirin.

P. Fransquet, Cheng-Long Yu, C. Tran et al. · 0 citations
Review Open access Aug 2026

Targeting Overweight and Obesity Phenotypes for Secondary Prevention of Cardiovascular Disease: A Call to Action for the Middle East and Beyond.

About 34 million patients across the Middle East could benefit from secondary prevention of CVD by targeting OAO phenotypes by targeting distinct OAO phenotypes, according to a pooled analysis of registry data and Global Burden of Disease data.

W. Almahmeed, J. Barajas-Gamboa, M. Zubaid et al. · 0 citations
Review Open access Jul 2026

Peripheral artery disease: advances in medical therapy.

A phenotype-driven approach is proposed to enable refined risk stratification across the PAD spectrum, supporting individualized and, when needed, more intensive management.

F. Garagoli, L. Slipczuk, Michael D. Shapiro et al. · 0 citations
Open access Aug 2026

Beyond lipids: a precision prevention blueprint for China's residual risk

International recommendations with current Chinese practice are compared, barriers related to infrastructure, safety, education, standardization, and evidence localization are analyzed, and a multimodal implementation framework for residual-risk assessment is proposed.

Ming Chi, Tao-Ming Qian, Ji-Rong Zhang et al. · 0 citations

We use cookies to run the site and, with your consent, for analytics and to show ads. See our Cookie Policy.