Aug 2026· Frontiers in Medicine· Vol 13· 0 citations· 28 references
Medicine
TL;DR
International recommendations with current Chinese practice are compared, barriers related to infrastructure, safety, education, standardization, and evidence localization are analyzed, and a multimodal implementation framework for residual-risk assessment is proposed.
Abstract
Despite achieving guideline-recommended lipid levels, patients with atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease (ASCVD) retain substantial residual risk arising from heterogeneous biological pathways, including persistent inflammation and genetically determined atherogenic susceptibility. High-sensitivity C-reactive protein (hs-CRP) provides a pragmatic measure of potentially modifiable inflammatory activity, whereas lipoprotein(a) [Lp(a)] identifies relatively stable, genetically mediated risk that is not adequately captured by standard lipid panels. The 2025 American College of Cardiology Scientific Statement highlights hs-CRP as a clinically useful inflammatory-risk marker and supports consideration of low-dose colchicine in appropriately selected secondary-prevention patients. The 2026 ACC/AHA multisociety dyslipidemia guideline further provides a Class I recommendation for once-in-a-lifetime Lp(a) measurement, creating a complementary multimodal framework for residual-risk assessment. In China, where cardiovascular disease accounts for a substantial proportion of deaths and the national cardiovascular burden continues to increase, implementation of this framework remains limited. Routine hs-CRP measurement is uncommon, cardiovascular use of colchicine remains negligible, and Lp(a) testing is still concentrated in selected tertiary centers. Emerging East Asian data and a recent Chinese expert advisory suggest that an hs-CRP threshold of approximately 1.0 mg/L may improve inflammatory-risk discrimination in Chinese patients with coronary artery disease; however, this threshold should not yet be interpreted as a stand-alone treatment threshold for colchicine. In this perspective, we compare international recommendations with current Chinese practice, analyze barriers related to infrastructure, safety, education, standardization, and evidence localization, and propose a multimodal implementation framework. Short-term priorities include once-in-a-lifetime Lp(a) measurement, context-specific hs-CRP assessment, intensified management of modifiable atherosclerotic risk factors, and carefully selected use of low-dose colchicine in secondary prevention. Elevated Lp(a) should prompt comprehensive risk-factor intensification and, when appropriate, family-based evaluation, but should not by itself constitute an indication for colchicine. Medium- and long-term priorities include pragmatic trials, real-world registries, assay standardization, cost-effectiveness studies, and policy initiatives to integrate residual-risk assessment into Chinese cardiovascular prevention pathways.
ABSTRACT Cardiovascular diseases (CVDs) remain the leading cause of global mortality, and the burden is rising fastest in low‐ and middle‐income countries (LMICs). Conventional risk calculators, such as Framingham and Systematic Coronary Risk Evaluation (SCORE), incorporate age, blood pressure, cholesterol, diabetes an...
Sana Rasheed, Azka Mujeeb, M. Sarfraz et al.· Public Health Challenges· 0 citations
A practical, evidence-based synthesis of Lp(a) biology, contemporary guideline recommendations, integrated risk stratification using PREVENT and CAC, current management, and emerging Lp(a)-targeted therapies for use across primary care and cardiology practice are provided.
A. Syed, Samuel Michalak, I. Potulapati et al.· Journal of Clinical Medicine· 0 citations
Treatment paradigms emphasize early intensification of therapy and addition of non-statin agents, and polygenic risk scoring and RNA-based therapies may offer opportunities to identify and treat those at highest residual risk.
Andrew Carlson, Zaid A. Zayyad, Stefanie Driesenga et al.· Cardiology and Therapy· 0 citations
Summary Background Guideline-recommended clinical risk scores such as AusCVDRisk underestimate cardiovascular disease (CVD) risk in a substantial proportion of individuals who later experience events, with up to 65% initially classified as low or intermediate risk. This limitation is most consequential in the intermedi...
Aleksandar Dakic, Jing-Qin Wu, Ting-Ting Wang et al.· EClinicalMedicine· 0 citations
Statins remain the cornerstone of pharmacological prevention for atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease (ASCVD) because of their proven ability to reduce low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) and major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE). However, many patients continue to experience ASCVD events despite ach...
Muhammad Abdul Rehman, M. O. Oduoye, D. J. Ozoemena et al.· Frontiers in Cardiovascular...· 0 citations