An in-depth systematic review was deplored to investigate the relationship between AI-powered learning tools, student engagement, and academic performance, focusing on the moderating roles of perceived ease of use (PEOU), frequency of AI tool use, instructor training and support (IT&S), and student digital literacy levels.
Abstract
The increasing rate of embracing artificial intelligence (AI) in higher institutions of learning globally has generated significant debate concerning its impact on student engagement and academic performance. While AI-powered tools promise personalized learning and greater efficiency, their effectiveness is highly dependent upon several moderating factors. An in-depth systematic review was deplored to investigate the relationship between AI-powered learning tools, student engagement, and academic performance, focusing on the moderating roles of perceived ease of use (PEOU), frequency of AI tool use, instructor training and support (IT&S), and student digital literacy levels. The detailed review synthesized existing literature to address vital research questions, exploring how these moderating factors influence the technology's effectiveness. The findings confirmed PEOU as the most significant predictor of positive student attitudes, while a higher frequency of AI tool use consistently correlates with better engagement and academic outcomes. Crucially,IT&S serves as the indispensable bridge, enabling instructors transition to studentcentred models and effectively manage AI's ethical and logistical demands. However, the in-depth review suggests that digital literacy plays a complex, but an indirect role: though it is necessary for technical competence, it does not automatically ensure greater academic engagement, suggesting a persistent need for motivationalapproaches. These findings highlight the need for balanced AI incorporation that prioritize both academic success and student well-being. This review contributes key insights for policymakers and developers seeking to enhance AI-powered learning environments
It is concluded that AI-powered assistant tools are effective instruments for enhancing academic engagement and critical thinking in Nigerian higher education, and recommends the institutionalization of AI literacy programmes and differentiated AI integration strategies that are responsive to students' gender and age c...
Faith Chinenye Okoye, Harriet Akudo Agbarakwe· International Journal of Edu...· 0 citations
This study demonstrated that AI-powered assessment captures more dimensions of engagement and applies more equity and transparency in evaluation practices, although success in these areas hinges on the delicate balance between technological bias and student trust.
S. Mohammad, Badrea Al Oraini, Hanan Jadallah et al.· 0 citations
This study aims to examine the effect of AI-powered tools on academic performance, conducted among students at the Faculty of Education at Ajilat city and explores the potential benefits and challenges of AI technology in education.
A. Saad· AlQalam journal of medical a...· 0 citations
The review indicates that while AI personalization is consistently associated with higher engagement and more favorable enrollment intentions in the studies examined, effects are moderated by digital literacy, platform design quality, and institutional context, and the evidence base remains fragmented across discipline...
V. V., J. K.· International Scientific Jou...· 0 citations
The skill-based dimensions of AI literacy were positively associated with AI dependency, whereas AI self-efficacy and academic self-efficacy were both negatively associated, suggesting a unified compensatory self-efficacy mechanism.