The skill-based dimensions of AI literacy were positively associated with AI dependency, whereas AI self-efficacy and academic self-efficacy were both negatively associated, suggesting a unified compensatory self-efficacy mechanism.
Abstract
The integration of artificial intelligence (AI) tools in higher education raises important questions about how students engage with these technologies and what shapes that engagement. This study examined how AI literacy, academic self-efficacy, and self-regulated resource management strategies are associated with students’ reported AI dependency. Participants were 478 students from Israeli higher education institutions who completed a cross-sectional online survey assessing AI dependency, AI literacy (four subscales), academic self-efficacy, and resource management strategies (time and study management, effort regulation, and help seeking). Multiple regression and K-means cluster analysis were used. The skill-based dimensions of AI literacy were positively associated with AI dependency, whereas AI self-efficacy and academic self-efficacy were both negatively associated, suggesting a unified compensatory self-efficacy mechanism. Effort regulation also predicted lower dependency, while general academic help seeking predicted higher dependency. The model explained 27.3% of the variance in AI dependency. Cluster analysis identified four learner profiles differing in literacy-dependency combinations and in self-regulatory resources. The findings suggest that fostering AI literacy alone is insufficient. Developing students’ self-efficacy beliefs and self-regulated learning practices appears equally important for promoting balanced and intentional AI engagement in higher education.
The findings suggest that the quantity of AI use and learners’ competency to understand, evaluate, and self-regulate AI use are empirically distinct indicators that universities should measure separately.
Results indicate that students reported relatively high levels of AI literacy, expectancy value, and self-regulated learning, suggesting that perceived proficiency plays a key role in shaping motivation, AI literacy, and learning regulation in AI-assisted EFL contexts.
Kate Tzu-Ching Chen, Ming-Tzer Lin· InSITE Conference· 0 citations
Findings extend the JD‐R model to AI‐supported higher education and highlight the importance of institutional support, AI literacy development, and psychological resource building in enhancing teachers' engagement.
Xin-Xing Wu· European Journal of Educatio...· 1 citation
The findings suggest that students’ psychological readiness plays a more important role than technology use alone in explaining perceived academic performance within AI-supported assessment environments.
The findings suggest that student engagement in AI‐assisted learning is linked not only to the availability of technological and interpersonal support, but also to the extent to which students experience learning as focused, absorbing and meaningful.
Ping Xu, Yongbi Zhi· European Journal of Educatio...· 0 citations
Results show that mindfulness was positively associated with AI literacy and AI self-efficacy among university students, and suggest that students reporting higher AI literacy also reported greater perceived capability in using AI-supported tools, indicating that technological understanding may be statistically related...
A. Aldbyani, Guiyun Wang, Chuanxia Zhang et al.· Scientific Reports· 0 citations
We use cookies to run the site and, with your consent, for analytics and to show ads.
See our Cookie Policy.