Aug 2026· Journal of International Relations and Foreign Policy· 0 citations· 9 references
Abstract
This article examines how the United States' 2025 tariff escalation under President Donald Trump reshaped
global trade governance and influenced the strategic responses of emerging powers in an era of geoeconomic
fragmentation. Drawing on a qualitative case study of India and employing the Strategic Autonomy
Adaptation Framework (SAAF), the analysis explores how the administration's use of Section 232, Section
301, and the International Emergency Economic Powers Act (IEEPA) expanded protectionist trade policies,
generated legal controversies, disrupted supply chains, and intensified pressures on the multilateral trading
system. Facing punitive tariffs on key export sectors and secondary penalties associated with Russian oil
imports, India confronted increased vulnerabilities in trade, finance, and external economic relations. The
findings show that India's response was characterized not by alignment with a single economic bloc but by
a strategy of market diversification, institutional hedging, and monetary diversification. Through
simultaneous engagement with BRICS+ institutions, Indo-Pacific initiatives, alternative payment
mechanisms, and broader trade partnerships, India sought to reduce external vulnerabilities while
preserving policy flexibility. The article argues that tariff-driven geoeconomic coercion encourages middle
powers to pursue strategic autonomy through diversification rather than exclusive alignment, highlighting
India's role as a connector state within an increasingly contested and multipolar international economic
order.
In the contemporary era of global commerce, the traditional leanings toward neoliberal liberalization are increasingly being challenged by a paradigm of "economic securitization." This article examines the legal complexities of recent United States (U.S.) tariff adjustments, specifically those enacted under Section 232...
Hilman Ibnu Wardi· American Journal of Internat...· 0 citations
It is predicted by the prevailing International Political Economy (IPE) framework of complex interdependence that political coercion is constrained by deepening economic ties. This logic appears to be exemplified by the India–US strategic partnership, with bilateral trade exceeding USD 149 billion in 2025. Yet between...
Kallakuri Meher Krishna· International Journal For Mu...· 0 citations
Against the backdrop of growing uncertainty in the global trading system, enhancing regional economic resilience through alternative trade channels—particularly in response to tariff-induced disruptions and the protracted U.S.–China trade conflict—has emerged as a pressing issue for both policy and academic inquiry. Th...
M. Xing, Yun-Hui Zhang, Chi Gong et al.· Economics· 0 citations
Based on the U.S.-China’s growing strategic competition from 2013 to 2025, the present paper explores the Pakistan’s strategic balancing with specific focus upon the economy and trade aspect of great power competition. It investigates four key facets of economic competition between the U.S. and China; that include tari...
Hafiz Ghulam Muhtada, Bilal Bin Liaqat, Ghulam Mustafa· SOCIAL PRISM· 0 citations
This Perspective article examines the role of tariffs and protectionism in contemporary economic
policy through the example of the U.S. President Donald Trump’s 2025 tariff regime. Although Trump’s
tariffs are presented as a way to restore American manufacturing, correct trade deficits, and strengthen
national security...
Dong Sun· American Journal of Student...· 0 citations
This paper examines the implications of the Trump administration’s trade policies for the future of the world trading system and the role Japan should play in response. It argues that, behind the discourse of “national security” and “economic security,” recent U.S. trade policies primarily seek to rebuild and protect d...
J. Nakagawa· Laws· 0 citations
We use cookies to run the site and, with your consent, for analytics and to show ads.
See our Cookie Policy.