Skip to content
Book Open access

Adaptive Toggling of Architectural Patterns for Federated Learning

Apr 2026 · SEAMS@ICSE · 1 citation · 41 references
Computer Science

TL;DR

Results indicate that dynamically toggling architectural patterns can be beneficial under specific conditions, with cases leading to an improvement of up to \(10\%\) in learning accuracy, at the cost of negligible overhead at deployment time.

Abstract

Federated Learning (FL) is increasingly adopted as an alternative to centralized Machine Learning (ML) techniques, as it allows clients to preserve the privacy of their data. However, FL systems pose new challenges in terms of adaptation, as design choices are conditioned by client characteristics and network conditions, thus necessitating adaptive strategies that elaborate on such a different operational environment. Previous work introduces a set of architectural patterns to support practitioners at design time, but their effectiveness has only been investigated when statically activated throughout the FL process. This work presents a novel FL framework, namely FLiP , where a subset of the aforementioned patterns are dynamically and adaptively toggled in response to evolving performance metrics and boundary conditions. We empirically evaluate FLiP across multiple federation configurations and two learning tasks, considering both static and dynamic conditions. Results indicate that dynamically toggling architectural patterns can be beneficial under specific conditions, with cases leading to an improvement of up to \(10\%\) in learning accuracy, at the cost of negligible overhead at deployment time.

Read PDF

Similar papers

Review Jul 2026

Federated Learning Meets Test-Time Adaptation: Methods, Challenges, and Future Directions

A comprehensive survey of FedTTA is provided, formalizing its problem setting and establishing a unified taxonomy encompassing three paradigms: i) Federated Initialization and Test Fine-tuning, where the global model serves as a robust prior for local refinement; ii) Federated Shared Backbone and Test Personalized Adap...

Chen Zhang, Ge Su, Huaxia Zhou et al. · 0 citations
Review Open access Aug 2026

A review of federated learning: architectures, challenges, and targeted solutions

A review of federated learning through a structured taxonomy that covers its core architectural paradigms, major learning types, model training approaches, and aggregation mechanisms, and analyzes the principal challenges confronting FL, including privacy and security risks, statistical and system heterogeneity, commun...

Mahdiyeh Velaei, Hosna Ghahramani, Ali Ghaffari et al. · 0 citations
Preprint Jul 2026

Robust Federated Learning Under Real-World Client Churn

FeLiX is presented, an FL orchestration framework that minimizes wall-clock time-to-target accuracy on live interaction streams and achieves near-oracular performance in real-world settings.

Dhruv Garg, Neha Lakhani, Debopam Sanyal et al. · 0 citations
Preprint Jul 2026

FLAIR: Distributed Federated Learning with Dynamic Clustering

FLAIR is introduced, a novel, fully decentralized FL protocol that integrates dynamic, resource-aware secure and self-organized clustering with in-cluster model training, presenting a robust and high performing solution for large-scale, heterogeneous IoT systems.

Ihssan Boutebicha, Bilel Zaghdoudi, Mohamed Amine Legheraba et al. · 0 citations
Conference Open access Sep 2026

DASFL: Dynamic Adaptive Split Federated Learning for Heterogeneous Clients

Split Federated Learning (SFL) has emerged as a pivotal paradigm for privacy-preserving distributed training on resource-constrained edge devices by partitioning neural networks between clients and a server. A critical design choice in SFL is the split layer, which determines the computation distribution and the semant...

Ai-Jing Li, Ya-Wen Li, Guan-Hua Ye et al. · 0 citations
Preprint Aug 2026

Could Model Partitioning Make Federated Learning More Sustainable?

This work proposes applying model partitioning, which can shift energy consumption by offloading parts of a model to another participant, in response to carbon- or grid-aware signals, in response to carbon- or grid-aware signals.

T. Frohlich, Tiffany J. Vlaar, L. Thamsen · 0 citations

We use cookies to run the site and, with your consent, for analytics and to show ads. See our Cookie Policy.