Jul 2026· WIREs Data Mining and Knowledge Discovery· Vol 16· 1 citation· 69 references
TL;DR
This survey addresses hallucination mitigation through the lens of explainability, proposing a taxonomy that distinguishes between internal explainability and post hoc explainability and discusses the constructive role of hallucinations in creative and user‐driven applications.
Abstract
Hallucinations in large language models (LLMs) present major obstacles to reliability in knowledge‐intensive and reasoning‐based tasks. While recent research has explored detection and correction techniques, a unified interpretive framework remains lacking. This survey addresses hallucination mitigation through the lens of explainability, proposing a taxonomy that distinguishes between internal explainability and post hoc explainability. We examine techniques such as attribution tracing, reasoning path construction, and prompt‐based verification, highlighting their roles in transparent diagnosis and structured control. Furthermore, we discuss the constructive role of hallucinations in creative and user‐driven applications, suggesting that context‐aware management may be more effective than blanket suppression. By synthesizing current advances, this review advocates for explainability as a foundation for trustworthy, controllable, and interpretable LLM systems.
This article is categorized under:
Fundamental Concepts of Data and Knowledge > Explainable AI
Technologies > Artificial Intelligence
Application Areas > Science and Technology
This review provides systematic theoretical support for industrial RAG model selection and optimization and summarizes existing research gaps, including lightweight deployment and multimodal expansion, and proposes future research directions for trustworthy RAG systems.
Shujing Liu· Applied and Computational En...· 0 citations
A concise two-axis framework that integrates an “intrinsic-extrinsic” distinction in source attribution introduced by Ji et al. with a “faithfulness-factuality” distinction in contextual grounding surveyed is presented, yielding four clearly defined hallucination types applicable across tasks, modalities and architectures.
Misbah Khan, Preston Billion-Polak, T. Khoshgoftaar· IEEE Access· 0 citations
This study proposes a novel conceptual framework and taxonomy for hallucination mitigation in low-code AI environments, integrating retrieval, validation, conflict resolution, and workflow orchestration mechanisms to contribute to the development of more reliable, transparent, and scalable AI systems.
I. K. W. Adnyana, Rosalin Theophilia Tayane, Fahmi Fahmi et al.· EDUKASIA Jurnal Pendidikan d...· 0 citations
This review paper provides a comprehensive overview of hallucinations in GAI and LLMs, and synthesizes a range of correction and mitigation techniques, from proactive measures during training to hybrid approaches that combine detection and intervention.
M. Naser· Language Resources and Evalu...· 0 citations
This survey provides a comprehensive treatment of the field across five interconnected dimensions, proposing a unified five-class taxonomy that organizes hallucinations by their failure mode: object, attribute, relational, factual, factual, and reasoning.
A. O. Ogar, Joshua Abah, M. Suleiman et al.· 0 citations
SeeMe is proposed, a training-free framework that introduces the concept of feature engineering from traditional machine learning into LVLMs and restructures visual tokens through a three-stage token engineering process to suppress hallucination sources while preserving informative visual evidence.
Kai Tang, Jinhao You, Bohua Zhang et al.· 2 citations