2026· Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics· pp. 32053-32071· 0 citations· 39 references
Computer Science
TL;DR
This paper introduces Travel-BehaviorQA, a large-scale benchmark dataset that reframes trajectory analysis as a language-based behavioral understanding task and establishes a rigorous benchmark for advancing language-based understanding of human mobility behavior.
Abstract
GPS trajectories encode rich behavioral information about how people move, organize activities, and form daily routines. Recent advances in large language models (LLMs) raise a natural question: can such models infer and summarize travel behavior directly from mobility traces? This paper introduces Travel-BehaviorQA , a large-scale benchmark dataset that reframes trajectory analysis as a language-based behavioral understanding task. The dataset links raw GPS trajectories with human-grounded question-answering (QA) pairs that capture travel intensity, temporal structure, activity patterns, mode usage, and behavioral routines. Unlike prior mobility datasets focused on prediction or classification, TravelBehaviorQA emphasizes semantic interpretation through a unified mix of deterministic and open-ended questions. In this benchmark, we construct over 143k QA instances spanning users and years, and evaluate a broad range of state-of-the-art LLMs under controlled settings. Our results reveal substantial gaps between factual extraction and genuine behavioral reasoning, showing that model scale alone is insufficient and that trajectory representation is a primary bottleneck. TravelBehaviorQA exposes critical limitations of current models and establishes a rigorous benchmark for advancing language-based understanding of human mobility behavior. The dataset is available at https://github.com/
Experiments show that MoRAL consistently outperforms statistical and LLM-based baselines under the GEO-BLEU metric, improving the mean score over the strongest baseline by 5.82% and achieving a 2.6 times reduction in per-user inference time relative to recent LLM baselines using the same backbone.
Chenhao Wang, Qingsen Ge, Nan Hu et al.· GeoInformatica· 0 citations
Findings characterize model-level behavioral priors relevant to LLM choice and prompt design in AV applications, and show that LLM decisions reflect a mix of model characteristics, linguistic framing, and scenario context.
Zhi-Peng Bao, Wen-Jie Zhao, Qian-Wen Li· Journal of Intelligent and C...· 0 citations
Overall, the study shows how conversational surveys, structured data processing, conventional behavioral modeling, machine learning, and multimodal LLM prediction can be coordinated within an auditable multi-agent workflow.
N. Ahmadi, Yubo Jiao, J. Manzolli et al.· 0 citations
This work establishes LLMs as high-fidelity behavior models for context-dependent tourist prediction, providing groundwork for counterfactual analysis of mobility interventions, and validates this approach using 566 trajectories from Wakayama Castle Park, Japan.
This work constructs walking- and cycling-based indicators of local service availability and examines their associations with trip duration, transport mode, and short-trip car use to demonstrate how explainable machine-learning methods can complement accessibility indicators and identify locally relevant hypotheses for...
A. Molnár, C. Sidló, Rita Rónai et al.· 0 citations
A framework to quantify mobility memorization at different levels of granularity: individual locations, anchor pairs, and subtrajectory segments is introduced and user-grounded reference sets are developed to assess how likely a model is to prefer training data over realistic alternatives.
A. J. Kouam, Hristo Boyadzhiev, Konrad Rieck· 0 citations
We use cookies to run the site and, with your consent, for analytics and to show ads.
See our Cookie Policy.