Skip to content

A Data-Free Physics-Informed Neural Operator for Level-Set Interface Advection

Sep 2026 · 0 citations · 36 references
Computer Science Physics

Abstract

Operators for interfacial problems are trained on reference solutions produced by the solver they are intended to replace. This work develops a data-free physics-informed neural operator for level-set interface advection, in which the interface is the equation's unknown and the operator maps an initial interface to the full spatiotemporal trajectory under a prescribed flow. Training uses only the transport residual and a geometric constraint; no reference solution enters the objective at any point. A spacetime Fourier backbone emits the entire trajectory in one pass, and the initial condition is imposed by construction rather than by penalty, which removes the competition between the anchoring term and the residual that otherwise arises when no solution data are available. Supervised and hybrid operators are trained under an identical architecture, family, budget and test set, and are reported throughout as baselines that quantify what refusing labels costs. On a reversed single vortex the data-free operator reaches 1.614 +/- 0.067% relative L2 error on 100 held-out initial interfaces against 0.369 +/- 0.035% for the supervised baseline, a factor of 4.4; on solid-body rotation the corresponding figures are 3.804 +/- 1.075% and 2.576 +/- 0.159%, a factor of 1.5. The two benchmarks rank the arms differently, and the difference is attributable to the eikonal constraint: the exact solution violates |grad phi| = 1 over 0.3% of the domain under rotation and 86.9% under the vortex. Where the constraint is valid the physics-trained operator conserves enclosed area 2.7 times better than the supervised baseline despite a larger field error, and a hybrid arm using eight reference solutions outperforms a supervised arm using sixteen.

View source

Similar papers

#machine learning Review Open access Oct 2014

Software development in startup companies: A systematic mapping study

The results indicate that software engineering work practices are chosen opportunistically, adapted and configured to provide value under the constrains imposed by the startup context.

Nicolò Paternoster, Carmine Giardino, M. Unterkalmsteiner et al. · 394 citations · ⚡54

Diffusion models as plug-and-play priors

The possibility of inferring high-dimensional data inference in a model that consists of a prior and an auxiliary differentiable constraint given some additional information is considered, thereby allowing a range of potential applications in adapting models to new domains and tasks.

Alexandros Graikos, Esmeralda S. Whitammer, N. Jojic et al. · 316 citations · ⚡15

Trajectory Balance: Improved Credit Assignment in GFlowNets

It is proved that any global minimizer of the trajectory balance objective can define a policy that samples exactly from the target distribution, and empirically demonstrate the benefits of the trajectories balance objective for GFlowNet convergence, diversity of generated samples, and robustness to long action sequenc...

Esmeralda S. Whitammer, Moksh Jain, Emmanuel Bengio et al. · 302 citations · ⚡60

KTO: Model Alignment as Prospect Theoretic Optimization

This work proposes a HALO that directly maximizes the utility of generations instead of maximizing the log-likelihood of preferences, and suggests that the best loss depends on the inductive biases most appropriate for a given setting, an oft-overlooked consideration.

Kawin Ethayarajh, Winnie Xu, Niklas Muennighoff et al. · 195 citations · ⚡28
#machine learning Review Open access Jun 2014

Why Early-Stage Software Startups Fail: A Behavioral Framework

This state-of-practice investigation was performed using a literature review followed by a multiple-case study approach and presents how inconsistency between managerial strategies and execution can lead to failure by means of a behavioral framework.

Carmine Giardino, Xiaofeng Wang, P. Abrahamsson · 175 citations · ⚡19

Related blog posts

Microsoft Research Blog Oct 12, 2026

Simulating student learning for better AI tutoring

StudentSim is a research system for evaluating and improving AI tutoring tools before they are tested with learners. It models how individuals may engage with tutors, giving feedback to improve tutor performance across subjects like chess, writing, and mathematics. The post Simulating student learning for better AI tutoring appeared first on Microsoft Research.

We use cookies to run the site and, with your consent, for analytics and to show ads. See our Cookie Policy.