Jul 2026· Tissue engineering. Part B, Reviews· pp.
19373368261460324
· 0 citations· 87 references
Medicine
TL;DR
This review critically examines the mechanobiological design of bioinspired polymeric scaffolds and discusses the role of computational modeling in predicting scaffold performance and highlights emerging technologies, including 4D printing and piezoelectric scaffolds, which offer time-dependent and mechano-electrical adaptability.
Abstract
Bone regeneration presents a significant clinical challenge due to the complex interplay between biological processes and the local mechanical environment. While polymeric scaffolds are widely utilized for their tunable physicochemical properties, traditional designs often fail to replicate the dynamic mechanical cues required for optimal tissue remodeling. This review critically examines the mechanobiological design of bioinspired polymeric scaffolds. We first categorize native bone mechanics and the role of mechanical stimuli-such as stiffness, fluid shear, and stability-in regulating the fracture healing cascade. We then bridge these biological principles with advanced fabrication strategies, analyzing how natural, synthetic, and composite polymers can be engineered to mimic the hierarchical stiffness and bioactivity of native bone. Furthermore, we discuss the role of computational modeling (e.g., Finite Element Analysis) in predicting scaffold performance and highlight emerging technologies, including 4D printing and piezoelectric scaffolds, which offer time-dependent and mechano-electrical adaptability. Finally, we address current barriers to clinical translation and propose future directions for mechanically adaptive systems that actively guide regeneration.
This review examines the mechanobiological mechanisms by which smart nanocomposite scaffolds regulate bone regeneration, with particular emphasis on interactions between scaffolds and stem cells, immune modulation, angiogenic coupling, and translational feasibility.
This review quantifies the range of piezoelectric coefficients and electrical outputs reported for hydrogels, critically compares fabrication methods with their scalability limitations, and outlines design guidelines for achieving stable, clinically translatable piezoelectric systems.
Electroactive biomaterials represent a promising strategy for reconstructing the electrobiological microenvironment of bone and enhancing tissue regeneration. Among these materials, poly(3,4-ethylenedioxythiophene) (PEDOT) and its composites have attracted considerable attention because of their mixed electronic and io...
Bone defects, especially critical-sized bone defects, still remain a major challenge due to limited intrinsic regenerative capacity. Limitations in biomimetic structure and functional performance in existing bone repair materials motivate the development of multifunctional osteogenic scaffolds. Herein, hierarchical top...
Xiaotong Wang, Xiaofeng Hu, Ruiqi Sheng et al.· Journal of materials chemist...· 0 citations
This review systematically outlines recent advances in injectable hydrogels for bone regeneration and analyzes key design strategies, including enhancing mechanical support through cross-linking optimization and the incorporation of reinforcing phases, reconstructing the regenerative microenvironment via bioactive fact...
Xin-Yue Zhang, Zhen-Shun Zhuang, Bo Liu et al.· RSC Advances· 0 citations
Current challenges, emerging trends, and future directions in the development of next-generation biomaterials that integrate biochemical and physicomechanical approaches for clinical applications in bone repair and regeneration are discussed.
Bofeng Pan, Adam Maalal, D. Hao· International Journal of Mol...· 0 citations
We use cookies to run the site and, with your consent, for analytics and to show ads.
See our Cookie Policy.