Skip to content
Review

Smart nanocomposite scaffolds for bone regeneration: Mechanobiological regulation and translational perspectives.

Jul 2026 · Tissue & Cell · Vol 104 Pt 1, pp. 103819 · 0 citations · 115 references
Medicine

TL;DR

This review examines the mechanobiological mechanisms by which smart nanocomposite scaffolds regulate bone regeneration, with particular emphasis on interactions between scaffolds and stem cells, immune modulation, angiogenic coupling, and translational feasibility.

Abstract

Critical-sized and load-bearing bone defects remain major clinical challenges. The intrinsic regenerative capacity of bone is frequently insufficient to achieve complete functional repair. Recent advances in smart nanocomposite scaffolds have shifted bone tissue engineering from passive structural support toward biologically instructive platforms capable of dynamically regulating cellular behavior and tissue repair. These advances represent a major conceptual and mechanobiological transformation in scaffold design; however, they should not be interpreted as indicating widespread clinical readiness. Despite encouraging preclinical outcomes, most smart scaffold systems remain in the preclinical or early translational stage because critical challenges related to mechanical reliability, scalable manufacturing, long-term biosafety, and regulatory approval remain unresolved. This review examines the mechanobiological mechanisms by which smart nanocomposite scaffolds regulate bone regeneration, with particular emphasis on interactions between scaffolds and stem cells, immune modulation, angiogenic coupling, and translational feasibility. Key regenerative pathways involving osteoconduction, mechanotransduction, ion-mediated signaling, electrical conductivity, and stimuli-responsive activation are analyzed in relation to scaffold composition, nanotopography, and microenvironmental regulation. Comparative translational analysis is provided for bone marrow-derived mesenchymal stem cells, adipose-derived stem cells, induced pluripotent stem cell-derived progenitors, and emerging exosome-based acellular regenerative strategies. In addition, major translational barriers, including manufacturing scalability, mechanical limitations in load-bearing environments, regulatory complexity, long-term biosafety, and reproducibility of cell-based therapies, are critically analyzed. Overall, this review provides a mechanobiological and translational framework for development of clinically applicable smart biomaterials for next-generation bone regenerative engineering. This review presents an evidence-stratified translational framework linking mechanistic pathways to supporting study types and corresponding translational barriers.

View source

Similar papers

Review Jul 2026

Mechanobiological Design of Bioinspired Polymeric Scaffolds for Bone Regeneration.

This review critically examines the mechanobiological design of bioinspired polymeric scaffolds and discusses the role of computational modeling in predicting scaffold performance and highlights emerging technologies, including 4D printing and piezoelectric scaffolds, which offer time-dependent and mechano-electrical a...

Shengyu Lyu, Jing Wang, Xiaoyan Ren et al. · 0 citations
Review Open access Jul 2026

Biochemical and Physicomechanical Cues of Biomaterials Guide Osteogenic Differentiation of Mesenchymal Stem Cells

Current challenges, emerging trends, and future directions in the development of next-generation biomaterials that integrate biochemical and physicomechanical approaches for clinical applications in bone repair and regeneration are discussed.

Bofeng Pan, Adam Maalal, D. Hao · 0 citations
Review Jul 2026

Decellularized Biomaterials for Tendon-to-Bone Healing: Advances and Translational Challenges.

A critical synthesis of recent advances in decellularized biomaterials for TBI healing is provided, covering tissue sources and preclinical and clinical evidence, and emerging functionalization strategies are highlighted, including biomimetic design, three-dimensional bioprinting, immune modulation, stem cell integrati...

Hong-Fu Jin, Chun-Sen Zhang, Jia-Hui Chen et al. · 0 citations
Review Open access Aug 2026

Study on the Effect of Scaffold Carriers on Tissue Repair and Rehabilitation in Cellular Environment

Scaffold carriers are three dimensional porous biomaterial structures that provide structural support, metabolic signalling and an appropriate cellular environment for tissue regeneration. This article covers the effects of scaffold carrier mechanisms on tissue healing and rehabilitation in three key tissue systems: bo...

Yu-Wei Jiang · 0 citations
Open access Jul 2026

Regulatory mechanism of stem cell scaffold porosity and stiffness on the processes of intramembranous ossification and bone regeneration.

Bone defects remain a significant clinical challenge due to the limited regenerative capacity. Biomaterials can offer effective therapeutic approaches to address this challenge, where their physical properties play a critical role in determining the success of regeneration. Here, we fabricated cryogelated 3D porous sca...

Qianqian Chen, Shichun Xu, Yiqi Su et al. · 0 citations
Review Open access Jan 2026

Recent Advances in Mechanobiology‐Mediated In Situ Tissue Engineering

Tissue engineering aims to repair, replace, or regenerate damaged tissues by integrating principles of biology, engineering, and material science. Traditional ex vivo strategies, involving prefabricated cell/scaffold constructs followed by implantation, have shown promise but face significant limitations, including poo...

H. Agbe, B. N. Jaato, Dominic A Dadzie et al. · 0 citations

We use cookies to run the site and, with your consent, for analytics and to show ads. See our Cookie Policy.