Skip to content
Open access

Spatial-Correlation-Aware Distribution-Adaptive Interval Prediction for Dam Monitoring via Two-Level Uncertainty Fusion

Aug 2026 · Applied Sciences · Vol 16, pp. 7671 · 0 citations · 33 references

Abstract

Long-term dam safety assessment relies on continuous monitoring data from multiple spatially distributed measurement points. However, monitoring data are affected by measurement noise, environmental disturbances, and model errors, while the spatial correlation among monitoring points is often ignored, leading to biased uncertainty estimation and unreliable prediction intervals. To address these issues, this study proposes a spatial-correlation-aware distribution-adaptive interval prediction method for dam monitoring via two-level uncertainty fusion. Measurement random noise is first separated using a filtering strategy, and its uncertainty is updated by incorporating the spatial correlation among multiple monitoring points. A regression model is then established based on the filtered monitoring data, and model prediction uncertainty is quantified from the residual distribution. The two uncertainty components are further integrated to construct distribution-adaptive asymmetric prediction intervals. The proposed method is verified using deformation monitoring data from the PB high core rockfill dam. The results show that the proposed method achieves an average PICP of 0.9898 on the training set, close to the target coverage level of 0.99, while reducing the average NMPIW by 16.9% and 13.4% compared with the symmetric interval method and the traditional 3σ method, respectively. On the validation set, the average NMPIW is further reduced by 18.4% and 26.5%, demonstrating that the proposed method can provide more compact and informative prediction intervals for refined dam safety monitoring.

Read PDF

Similar papers

Review Open access Aug 2026

A Field-Oriented Forecasting Framework for Multi-Point Dam Displacement Prediction

Dam displacement forecasting is important for assessing whether long-term structural responses remain consistent with established operational behavior. In multi-point monitoring systems, however, irregular survey-line layouts and unequal numbers of monitoring points make it difficult to organize long-term records while...

Xin Xu, Jun Zhang, Shuangping Li et al. · 0 citations
Open access Jul 2026

A Multi-Source Monitoring Data Fusion and Early Warning Framework Based on LightGBM-SHAP and Weibull Distribution

This paper addresses the need for multi-source data fusion and risk early warning in slope monitoring by proposing a modeling method that integrates data calibration, feature interpretation, and hierarchical early warning. First, linear regression is used to calibrate fiber-optic displacement data, and data consistency...

Haiben Lin, Jie-Kai Li, Qi-Qi Li · 0 citations
Aug 2026

Application of remote sensing and digital technologies in monitoring mining infrastructure

Monitoring mining infrastructure is essential for ensuring operational safety and minimizing environmental risks associated with subsidence and structural instability. However, existing approaches often rely on single-source data, limiting their ability to capture complex and dynamic deformation processes. This study p...

Nurbek Abdixamidov, Maksuda Juraeva, Nafosat Meyliyeva et al. · 0 citations
Open access Sep 2026

An Integrated Multi‐Component Error Verification Method for Numerical Weather Prediction

This study introduces an integrated multi‐component error verification approach (IMEV) that decomposes forecast errors into three physically interpretable components: accumulation error (systematic intensity discrepancy), area error (areal coverage and spatial extent mismatch), and pattern error (distributional dissimi...

Xi-Yu Mu, Qi Xu, Guoqing Liu et al. · 0 citations

Dynamic Reconstruction and Assessment Model of Road Accident Risk Domain Incorporating Spatial Attenuation Effects and Multidimensional Coupling

Traditional identification of accident-prone road sections relies on fixed-unit statistics, which has disadvantages that include missing spatial continuity of risk, boundary distortion, and information “averaging,” and struggles to support differentiated safety management. To address this issue, this study proposes a...

Jianfeng Liu, Fuyuan Luo, Jianqiu Chen et al. · 0 citations
Open access Jul 2026

Spatial-Aware Uncertainty Quantification for Low-Cost PM2.5 Sensors: GeoConformal Prediction vs. Monte Carlo Dropout Under Wildfire Distribution Shift

Low-cost air quality sensors can expand PM2.5 monitoring networks but require calibration against regulatory-grade monitors to correct systematic bias towards trustworthy observations. Although interest in predictive uncertainty for air quality estimation has increased, the reliability of uncertainty under spatial spar...

Anusha Srirenganathan Malarvizhi, Kaylee A. Smith, Seren Smith et al. · 1 citation

We use cookies to run the site and, with your consent, for analytics and to show ads. See our Cookie Policy.