Jul 2026· Istanbul University Journal of Health Sciences Research· 0 citations· 18 references
TL;DR
Optization of MC-based 3D culture conditions showed that medium viscosity affects both spheroid morphology and transcriptional regulation, indicating that the physical properties of the microenvironment influence ESR1 expression and ERα activity.
Abstract
Objective: Breast cancer (BC) is the most frequently diagnosed cancer in women, with the luminal subtype representing most cases. Luminal tumors depend on the ERα-FOXA1-GATA3 transcriptional network, which is influenced by the tumor microenvironment. Although three-dimensional (3D) culture systems better mimic in vivo conditions than 2D models, luminal breast cancer cells often fail to form stable spheroids. This study aimed to optimize 3D culture conditions and examine how microenvironmental architecture influences the ERα–FOXA1–GATA3 network.Material and Methods: We cultured MCF7 and T47D cells under standard conditions to establish 3D models. We seeded cells on Petri dishes containing media supplemented with different concentrations of methylcellulose (MC) to promote spheroid formation. We monitored morphology microscopically. We analyzed the expression levels of ESR1, FOXA1, and GATA3 in 2D and 3D cultures by RT-qPCR. We evaluated ERα chromatin binding at selected target regions by ChIP-qPCR. We assessed statistical significance using Student's t-test.Results: Optimization of MC-based 3D culture conditions showed that medium viscosity affects both spheroid morphology and transcriptional regulation. Spheroids formed under 10% MC displayed increased expression of ESR1, FOXA1, and GATA3 compared with 2D cultures. CRISPR/Cas9-mediated knockout of ESR1 and FOXA1 disrupted spheroid organization. ChIP-qPCR analysis revealed viscosity-dependent changes in ERα chromatin binding, demonstrating that spheroid compactness influences ERα transcriptional activity. Data represent mean ± SD from three independent experiments.Conclusion: These findings indicate that the physical properties of the microenvironment influence ESR1 expression and ERα activity. Optimization of 3D culture conditions is therefore important for accurately studying ERα signaling in luminal breast cancer models.
An effective 3D co-culture system of breast cancer cells and integrated macrophages for studying dynamic cellular phenotype changes and reciprocal interactions in a heterogeneous environment to mimic aspects of the TME and enhance the accuracy of preclinical in vitro treatment response studies is presented.
Chen Cheng, Brett A. McGregor, J. Hur et al.· PLoS ONE· 0 citations
Nowadays, most cancer research still depends on traditional cell culture in Petri dishes or cell culture flasks which do not have the ability to mimic physiological-like conditions in vitro. However, the behavior of cancer cells strongly relies on the interaction with their extracellular microenvironment. Consequently,...
Theresa Wießner-Kroh, Stefanie Hübschmann, Gudrun Marquardt et al.· International Journal of Mol...· 0 citations
Three-dimensional cancer spheroids mimic key morphological and biological features of solid tumors, providing a valuable model for evaluating drug responses and novel insight into the mechanisms underlying 3D growth and chemoresistance that may help inform future therapeutic strategies.
Sithumini Sarathchandra, Chiara Fittipaldi, N. A. Alamukii et al.· BMC Cancer· 0 citations
These findings establish a direct mechanistic link between TME and cancer cell stemness, demonstrating that TME can reprogram stemness and drug responsiveness through mechano-epigenetic regulation.
Duoduo Zhang, Yung-Chiang Liu, Chun-Chan Li et al.· ACS Applied Materials and In...· 0 citations
The 3D co-culture model provides a biomimetic platform for simulating the PCa bone-metastatic microenvironment and may serve as a useful tool for preclinical drug screening and evaluation of combination treatment strategies for bone-metastatic prostate cancer.
Chengyi Zhong, M. Pang, Hang Sun et al.· Journal of Advanced Research· 0 citations
Key features and heterogeneity of ccRCC vascular architecture are defined and ponds are highlighted as candidate contributors to treatment failure and targets for future interventions.
Noémie Brassard-Jollive, Y. Atlas, C. Compere et al.· Angiogenesis· 0 citations
We use cookies to run the site and, with your consent, for analytics and to show ads.
See our Cookie Policy.