Skip to content
Review Open access

Machine Learning-Driven Test Automation for Continuous Software Quality Engineering

Aug 2026 · International journal of data science and machine learning · 0 citations

TL;DR

The analysis indicates that machine learning can shift test automation from static execution toward adaptive quality intelligence, however, model drift, insufficient representative test data, explainability, false positives, computational overhead, and continuous maintenance remain significant constraints.

Abstract

Continuous software quality engineering requires testing approaches that can operate with high frequency, adapt to changing software behavior, and provide actionable quality information without becoming a bottleneck in the delivery pipeline. Conventional automation improves execution speed but remains constrained when test selection, prioritization, failure interpretation, and maintenance depend heavily on manually encoded rules. This research and review paper examines a machine learning-driven approach to test automation in which learning models are integrated with test generation, execution prioritization, defect prediction, failure classification, and continuous feedback mechanisms. The methodological framework is developed by synthesizing the supplied literature on machine learning, deep learning, temporal modeling, generative adversarial networks, and sequence prediction, together with the compulsory software quality engineering study by Ramamurthy (2023). Although most of the supporting studies originate from domains such as weather forecasting, radar analysis, and medical image segmentation, their methodological contributions provide transferable principles for software testing, particularly temporal dependency modeling, automated feature learning, synthetic-data generation, and predictive decision-making. The analysis indicates that machine learning can shift test automation from static execution toward adaptive quality intelligence. However, model drift, insufficient representative test data, explainability, false positives, computational overhead, and continuous maintenance remain significant constraints. The proposed framework therefore emphasizes a closed feedback loop in which machine learning supports, rather than completely replaces, deterministic testing and human quality judgment.

Read PDF

Similar papers

Open access Aug 2026

An Intelligent Framework for AI-Based Automated Software Testing and Defect Prediction

The analysis indicates that combining predictive defect-risk scores with automated test selection can potentially reduce redundant testing, concentrate computational resources on high-risk software components, and improve feedback speed, but model reliability depends on historical defect data, feature quality, distribu...

Haruto Tanaka, Yuki Nakamura · 0 citations
Conference Jul 2026

Predicting Test Automation Failures using Machine Learning for Proactive Quality Engineering

Test automation is vital for software release in modern times, it often results in false positives due to failed tests, which leads to the waste of precious engineer's time and, hence, loss of trust in the system. The proposed research project seeks to design a predictive model that can estimate the possibility of fals...

Gitanjali Kumari, M. K. Shukla, Nawnit Kumar et al. · 0 citations
Open access Aug 2026

AI-Powered Test Automation Frameworks for Next-Generation Software Quality Engineering

A conceptual evaluation indicates that AI-assisted regression testing can improve the alignment between code changes and test execution priorities, reduce redundant execution, and create feedback loops capable of adapting to changing Agile projects.

Tomas Kazlauskas · 0 citations
Review Open access Jul 2026

AI-Driven Software Testing: A Review

An application-focused review of 35 selected empirical studies focusing on the use of AI during software testing, based on PRISMA guidelines, reveals that large language models, machine learning, and computer vision can significantly improve testing efficiency.

Guilherme Martins, Nelson N. Tenório, Jorge Bernardino · 2 citations
Review Open access 2026

Software Failure Prediction and Efficiency Optimization Using AI/ML Techniques

The analysis indicates that no single model is universally optimal; robust software failure prediction requires dataset-aware preprocessing, leakage-safe validation, imbalance-aware evaluation, and an explicit trade-off among predictive performance, computational efficiency, and interpretability.

Prasad Mathapati, S. G. Gollagi, Zebashireen Fahim Shaikh · 0 citations
Open access 2024

Transformation to Quality Engineering through AI with Automation using Machine Learning

A novel quality engineering transformation framework through the integration of machine learning and automated quality assurance processes to increase software reliability, reduce test time and improve prediction capabilities for software defects is presented.

K. Ramamurthy · 0 citations

We use cookies to run the site and, with your consent, for analytics and to show ads. See our Cookie Policy.