Skip to content
Open access

Implant stability following septal expansion in immediate mandibular molars: a pilot randomized clinical trial comparing piezoelectric surgery and osseodensification

Jul 2026 · BMC Oral Health · Vol 26 · 1 citation · 52 references
Medicine

TL;DR

It is demonstrated that PISP achieves comparable biomechanical stability to OD, establishing its clinical feasibility for immediate molar implant placement in anatomically complex posterior regions.

Abstract

Immediate implant placement (IIP) in mandibular molars is challenged by wide extraction sockets and limited septal bone support. This pilot feasibility randomized clinical trial evaluated primary and secondary implant stability following septal expansion using piezoelectric surgery (PISP) compared with osseodensification (OD) using Densah® burs. Twenty patients were randomly allocated (1:1) to either PISP group or OD group for immediate mandibular molar implant placement. The primary outcome was implant stability quotient (ISQ), measured immediately and at 3 months. Secondary outcomes included insertion torque, osteotomy preparation time, and postoperative pain assessed using a visual analogue scale (VAS) during the first postoperative week. Normality was evaluated using Shapiro–Wilk tests and Q–Q plots. Between-group comparisons were performed using independent t-tests, while VAS scores were analyzed using Mann–Whitney U and Friedman tests (α = 0.05). No statistically significant differences were observed between groups in primary or secondary ISQ (p > 0.05). Both groups demonstrated a significant increase in ISQ at 3 months compared with baseline (p < 0.001). The mean insertion torque was significantly higher in the PISP group (40.33 ± 3.24 Ncm; p = 0.004) compared to the OD group (35.00 ± 3.53 Ncm). Osteotomy preparation time was significantly longer in the PISP group (9.00 ± 0.94 min) than in the OD group (6.00 ± 0.82 min) (p < 0.001). Postoperative VAS pain scores were significantly lower in the PISP group throughout the first week (p < 0.05). All implants achieved clinical stability with no intra- or postoperative complications. The preliminary findings of this pilot feasibility trial demonstrated that PISP achieves comparable biomechanical stability to OD, establishing its clinical feasibility for immediate molar implant placement in anatomically complex posterior regions. NCT06957860 ; registered May 5, 2025.

Read PDF

Similar papers

Jul 2026

Digitally assisted immediate implant placement in posterior mandibular long-span prostheses: a prospective evaluation of loading protocols and clinical outcomes.

Type A loading may provide a predictable and time-efficient alternative to conventional delayed loading without compromising clinical outcomes and Digitally guided immediate implant placement in the posterior mandible demonstrated high survival rates and favorable peri-implant outcomes with both Type A and Type C loadi...

Mohammed A. El-Sawy, Mohammed T. Khater, Islam Kandil et al. · 1 citation
Aug 2026

The Effect of Osseodensification and Conventional Implant Site Preparation on Implant Stability of Tapered and Cylindrical Dental Implants: A Randomized Controlled Study.

Neither the choice of drilling technique nor the implant macrogeometry significantly influences insertion torque or stability levels in regions of low bone density in this randomized controlled clinical study.

Worood A Akram, S. Bede · 0 citations
Open access Aug 2026

Insertion Torque Value and Implant Stability Quotient of Bone-Level Versus Tissue-Level Dental Implants: A Pilot Randomized Clinical Trial

The dissociation between insertion torque and 90-day stability indicates that secondary stability is governed by factors beyond initial mechanical engagement, and suggests a potential long-term biomechanical difference warranting further study.

Ahmed Elkattan, Mónica Blázquez-Hinarejos, H. Assiri et al. · 0 citations
Review Open access Jul 2026

A prospective randomized split-mouth trial comparing immediate versus early anterior implant placement with customized healing abutments: 12-month marginal bone loss, stability, and esthetic outcome

The clinically meaningful esthetic advantages of IIP support its preferential use in the anterior zone when anatomical conditions permit and when combined with guided protocols and customized healing abutments, IIP and EIP yield comparable 12-month marginal bone outcomes.

Sara N. El Touliani, Ahmed M. Abdel-Hamid, Nada M. H. Fahmy et al. · 0 citations
Case report Open access Aug 2026

Immediate Implant Placement in the Mandibular Molar Septum Using Osseodensification: A Case Report with 4-Year Follow-Up

The clinical outcome supports current evidence indicating that osseodensification may enhance initial stability and predictability of immediate implants placed in posterior mandibular regions.

Márcio de Carvalho Formiga, Jucielly Santos Lesnik de Souza, Gustavo dos Santos Coura et al. · 0 citations
Open access Aug 2026

Prefabricated CAD/CAM zirconia membrane versus contour augmentation with early implant placement in the anterior maxilla: a randomized controlled clinical trial

Customized CAD/CAM zirconia membranes achieved horizontal bone augmentation comparable to conventional collagen membranes when used for simultaneous GBR during early implant placement, indicating that customized rigid barriers may represent a predictable alternative for horizontal ridge augmentation while offering pote...

Mohammed Mashhout Anas, A. M. Gabr, Yasser El-Makaky et al. · 0 citations

We use cookies to run the site and, with your consent, for analytics and to show ads. See our Cookie Policy.