The experimental results validate the effectiveness of the LabDex task design and demonstration data, and show that the benchmark supports the training and systematic evaluation of existing robotic policies across laboratory dexterous manipulation tasks at different levels, providing a foundation for further research and development of autonomous laboratory robots.
Abstract
Autonomous laboratories hold great promise for accelerating scientific discovery. To achieve this vision, robots are supposed to dexterously manipulate diverse labware and instruments and execute long-horizon, state-dependent experimental procedures. Yet existing benchmarks do not jointly capture dexterous hand use, real-world laboratory interactions, and multi-stage experimental procedures, limiting systematic training and evaluation. To bridge this gap, we introduce LabDex, a large-scale real-world dataset and benchmark for dexterous manipulation in chemistry laboratories, organized around a hierarchical task taxonomy spanning atomic skills, compositional tasks, and long-horizon experiments. First, LabDex is cross-platform and, for the first time, unifies real-world and simulation platforms under a common framework, providing standardized task definitions, demonstrations, and evaluation protocols. Second, LabDex is large-scale and systematically organizes chemistry laboratory operations into three interconnected levels: Atomic Skills, which characterize fundamental dexterous manipulation capabilities; Compositional Skills; and Long-Horizon Laboratory Workflows. This hierarchical design not only supports the evaluation of end-task performance, but also enables the analysis of how fundamental dexterous skills compose and influence more complex laboratory operations. We conduct cross-level evaluations of representative robot learning methods in both real-world and simulation environments. The experimental results validate the effectiveness of the LabDex task design and demonstration data, and show that the benchmark supports the training and systematic evaluation of existing robotic policies across laboratory dexterous manipulation tasks at different levels, providing a foundation for further research and development of autonomous laboratory robots.
The RoboSynChallenge competition introduces a unified benchmark to evaluate and advance the generalizability of manipulation policies across a spectrum of tasks, environments, and difficulty levels and aims to foster the development of broadly capable, data-efficient, and adaptable manipulation systems, thereby paving...
Runyi Zhao, Rui-Han Wu, Cheng-Kun Li et al.· 0 citations
Results indicate that the correct learned policy can outperform classical vision and control robotic methods in robustness, generalization, and deployment efficiency, justifying a shift toward scalable robotic automation for high up-time industrial environments.
Honglu He, Jacob Laufer, Zhiwu Zheng et al.· arXiv.org· 0 citations
Results reveal substantial challenges in task generalization and visuomotor robustness, establishing DexVerse as a promising testbed for general-purpose dexterous manipulation.
AXIS, a growable community-driven data engine and benchmark for scalable robot learning, is presented, which enables browser-based teleoperation for large-scale demonstration collection, automatically generates and validates new manipulation tasks, and transforms community-collected demonstrations into training-ready d...
IMBENCH is introduced, a benchmark designed to evaluate intuitive manipulation as an integrated capability spanning perception, physical reasoning, action generation, and iterative execution, and position IMBENCH as a step toward evaluating and enabling more integrated, adaptive physical intelligence.
LabEvolver couples a state-grounded inner trial loop for adaptive perception, online planning, and safety validation with an outer evolution loop that distills completed trajectories into reusable skill, strategy, and safety experience, showing generality beyond wet-lab settings.