Aug 2026· Clinical Interventions in Aging· Vol 21· 0 citations· 30 references
Medicine
TL;DR
Combining frailty with an objective inflammation–nutrition risk composite modestly improved internal model performance for 30-day severe complications and 90-day readmission in older EC patients, and 1-year non-EC death analysis remains exploratory.
Abstract
Background Frailty and systemic inflammation/immune–protein reserve may drive adverse outcomes after endometrial cancer (EC) surgery in older patients, but their incremental predictive value is unclear. Methods We analyzed a retrospective cohort of women ≥65 years undergoing primary EC surgery between January 2016 and December 2024. Frailty was assessed using mFI‑5. Inflammation–nutrition status (INS) was derived from routine preoperative laboratory tests as exploratory composite. The primary endpoint was 30‑day severe complications (Clavien–Dindo III–V), and the secondary endpoint was 90‑day unplanned readmission to the index hospital. One‑year non–endometrial cancer (non‑EC) death was exploratory with EC death as a competing event. Logistic regression and Fine–Gray models were fitted. Incremental prediction versus a prespecified baseline perioperative clinical model was evaluated with bootstrap optimism‑corrected discrimination, calibration, and decision‑curve analysis. Results Severe complications occurred in 62 (7.1%) and readmission in 71 (8.1%). One‑year non‑EC and EC deaths were 28 (3.2%) and 19 (2.2%), respectively. mFI‑5 and INS predicted severe complications (OR per 1‑point mFI‑5 1.43 [95% CI 1.22–1.67]; OR per 1‑SD INS 1.34 [1.15–1.55]) and readmission (OR 1.28 [1.10–1.50]; OR 1.22 [1.05–1.41]). For non‑EC death, mFI‑5 (SHR 1.52 [1.23–1.88]) and INS (SHR 1.37 [1.11–1.69]) were significant. Adding mFI‑5+INS improved discrimination (AUC 0.69 to 0.77 for complications; 0.63 to 0.70 for readmission) and the time-dependent C-index for the exploratory competing-risk endpoint (0.66 to 0.73), with acceptable calibration. Decision-curve findings were descriptive rather than definitive. Conclusion Combining frailty with an objective inflammation–nutrition risk composite modestly improved internal model performance for 30-day severe complications and 90-day readmission in older EC patients, and 1-year non-EC death analysis remains exploratory. These findings should be interpreted as perioperative rather than purely preoperative prediction, and decision thresholds require external validation before protocolized use.
Integrating serum albumin, hematocrit, BMI, spinal region, and procedure type with frailty indices enhances risk stratification and informs surgical planning, preoperative optimization, and patient counseling in this vulnerable population of patients.
A. Ghaith, Xinlan Yang, Yazan Alasadi et al.· European spine journal· 0 citations
Because this retrospective study was limited by sample size, comorbidity-driven mFI-5 scoring, non-standardized delirium screening, and potential residual confounding, mFI-5 should be interpreted as a convenient screening marker rather than a stand-alone predictor.
K. Yamagata, S. Fukuzawa, Shohei Takaoka et al.· Diagnostics· 0 citations
The use of FI-lab in objectively quantifying frailty could be extended to peri-operative risk stratification for elderly colorectal cancer resection patients.
K. Ari, A. Abdelaal, Jenny Little et al.· British Journal of Surgery· 0 citations
FRAIL Scale improvement was driven mainly by resolution of the weight‐loss criterion, with modest weight gain and no clear overall body‐weight recovery, supporting a multidimensional interpretation of postoperative recovery in older patients.
H. Ushigome, Takuya Suzuki, S. Hayakawa et al.· Annals of Gastroenterologica...· 0 citations
This LASSO-derived nomogram provides transparent, bedside-applicable risk stratification for postoperative composite complications in CRC surgery, identifying nutritional status as the dominant modifiable predictor and supporting targeted perioperative optimization.
Lu Wang, Shunshun Wang, Liqin Deng· Frontiers in Nutrition· 0 citations
The 5-item Modified Frailty Index is a simple and clinically useful tool for identifying older head and neck cancer patients at increased risk of adverse outcomes following major surgery.
John J Sykes, Edgar D. Uribe Sanchez, D. Benito et al.· Oral Oncology· 1 citation
We use cookies to run the site and, with your consent, for analytics and to show ads.
See our Cookie Policy.