Skip to content
Open access

AI-SAFE FlightNet : A Next-Generation Artificial Intelligence and Automation Framework for Predictive Flight Safety, Aircraft Health Intelligence, and Ground Operations Coordination

Aug 2026 · Engineering and Technology Journal · 0 citations

TL;DR

AI-SAFE FlightNet is proposed, a Safety-Aware, Intelligent, Federated, Explainable Flight Automation Network that integrates aircraft data intelligence, onboard edge AI, subsystem digital twins, phase-aware predictive analytics, evidence-grounded coordination, ground operations support, federated fleet learning, and governance by design.

Abstract

Aviation safety improvement remains a continuous engineering challenge because modern aircraft are sensor-dense, software-intensive, and operationally interconnected, while health and operations data often remain fragmented across onboard, maintenance, dispatch, and ground systems. This fragmentation can delay weak-signal recognition and coordinated response. This paper proposes AI-SAFE FlightNet, a Safety-Aware, Intelligent, Federated, Explainable Flight Automation Network that integrates aircraft data intelligence, onboard edge AI, subsystem digital twins, phase-aware predictive analytics, evidence-grounded coordination, ground operations support, federated fleet learning, and governance by design. The framework supports pilots, engineers, dispatchers, and maintenance controllers without replacing certified human authority or certified aviation systems. A formal model combines sensor, flight-phase, environmental, and maintenance-history variables to estimate risk trajectories, prioritize alerts, and generate auditable response packages. The proposed evaluation uses public engine-degradation and trajectory datasets, synthetic subsystem telemetry, simulated maintenance records, and digital-twin experiments. Expected contributions are earlier warning, improved maintenance readiness, faster aircraft-to-ground coordination, privacy-preserving fleet learning, explainable recommendations, and measurable operational risk reduction. The objective is improved resilience and decision support, not zero risk or unrestricted autonomous control.

Read PDF

Similar papers

Jul 2026

MulRobBench: A Decision-Level Benchmark for Safe and Security-Policy-Compliant Multimodal UAV Agents

MulRobBench provides a reproducible benchmark for trustworthy multimodal UAV decision making under realistic operational constraints and identifies modality-trust selection, constraint extraction, glare, missing data, and operator shorthand as the primary causes of decision instability.

B. Alsinglawi, Wei-Zheng Wang, Jun-Yi Wu et al. · 0 citations
Preprint Aug 2026

Traceable LLM-Generated Hazard Scenarios for Operational Safety Analysis of Aviation Systems Using ASRS Reports

This work presents an AI-assisted approach that generates candidate hazard scenarios from NASA's Aviation Safety Reporting System (ASRS), and proposes a hybrid variant, conditioning narrative generation on a structured hypothesis produced via evolutionary abduction, improving correctness and reducing variability.

Cristian Mascia, R. Pietrantuono, Daniel Rodríguez et al. · 0 citations
Aug 2026

An integrated operational safety assurance method for reconfigurable flight control systems based on uncertainty quantification and resilience decision-making

The dynamic reconfigurability of civil aircraft flight control systems (FCS) enhances mission adaptability yet introduces significant operational uncertainty. Traditional static safety assurance methods often fail to cope with such real-time variations. To address this, this paper proposes an integrated safety assuranc...

Wenshen Peng, Jun-Ran Wang, Kai Xue et al. · 0 citations
Open access Jul 2026

Cyber-resilient flight architecture for software-defined UAVs using digital twin-based validation

Software-Defined Unmanned Aerial Vehicles (SD-UAVs) rely heavily on software control and networked communication, making them vulnerable to cyber-physical attacks that threaten flight safety and mission reliability. Traditional UAV security approaches are largely reactive and lack integrated resilience mechanisms capab...

I. Emeto, A. Adamu, I. Ezeh et al. · 0 citations

We use cookies to run the site and, with your consent, for analytics and to show ads. See our Cookie Policy.