Continuous depth batching (CDB) is introduced, which schedules at the granularity of individual loop iterations, and handles boundary stages and loop steps in separate priority queues, makes exit decisions one step ahead, and overlaps all scheduling work with GPU computation.
Abstract
A main promise of looped language models (LMs) is depth-adaptive inference. By iterating a block of shared layers a variable number of times, the model can use less compute for"easy"tokens and more for"hard"ones. However, this adaptivity breaks standard batching: tokens in the same batch now require a different number of loops, so there is no unified forward pass, making efficient inference difficult. Standard inference frameworks like vLLM schedule on the token level and cannot handle this because tokens need to be removed from the batch within the forward pass. Loop-level scheduling has been proposed as a solution, but never implemented end to end. The key challenge is that looped architectures also contain non-looped boundary stages (e.g., token embedding and LM head) that must be scheduled at different frequencies than the loop. We introduce continuous depth batching (CDB), which schedules at the granularity of individual loop iterations. CDB handles boundary stages and loop steps in separate priority queues, makes exit decisions one step ahead, and overlaps all scheduling work with GPU computation. On Ouro 1.4B and Huginn 3.5B, CDB can realize up to $99\%$ of the theoretical maximum speed-up from adaptive-depth, translating to $1.5$-$1.9\times$ higher offline throughput and $45$-$90\%$ lower normalized latency under dynamic serving load.
Recent work on looped language models suggests that many reasoning problems benefit from greater computational depth rather than from additional independent parameters. Existing studies, however, focus almost exclusively on Transformer backbones, leaving open whether this principle also applies to state-space language...
Zhen-Xuan Yu, Takeshi Kojima, Yutaka Matsuo et al.· 0 citations
RecurTrace introduces Loop Memory Attention, which lets each looped layer attend to its own states from previous iterations along the loop-time axis, so the model can revisit earlier computations instead of relying on the latest state alone.
Yu-Xiang Wang, Kun-Yu Feng, Ying-Da Shen et al.· 7 citations
CoRun is presented, a scheduling-based system that achieves deterministic inference without requiring batch invariance, and employs isolated prefill and fixed-shape batched decode to handle the two stages of LLM inference, respectively, leveraging CUDA graphs for efficient execution and simplified implementation.
Shiju Zhao, Jiacheng Yang, Qi-Hang Chen et al.· 2 citations
Speculative reduction is proposed, which initiates data transfer before the top barrier and ensures correctness via lightweight validation during low-latency inference, which reduces synchronization overhead during low-latency inference.
Hritvik Taneja, A. Saxena, Abhishek Revinipati et al.· arXiv.org· 1 citation
Large Language Models (LLMs) trained using Chain-of-Thought (CoT) supervision have achieved state-of-the-art performance on complex reasoning tasks. However, the generation of long reasoning chains introduces substantial computational overhead during inference, limiting their deployment in low-latency and resource-cons...
V. A, Mithaguru, Amrita Kundu et al.· 2026 4th International Confe...· 0 citations
This work proposes Chained Recursive Language Models (Chained RLM), an inference-time architecture, in which the same underlying model is called repeatedly as a sequence of fresh reasoning roots, and studies when fresh-context artifact continuation gives a measurable gain in accuracy over direct LLM answering even with...
Purbesh Mitra, S. Ulukus· 0 citations
Related blog posts
MIT News · Artificial Intelligence· news.mit.eduOct 15, 2026
A new computational approach reveals how cells communicate to assemble into tissues. This could accelerate stem cell engineering, improve disease models, and inform therapies.
Microsoft Research Blog· microsoft.comOct 15, 2026
Zero-knowledge proofs can verify computing results without rerunning workloads or exposing sensitive data. Magnetar helps bring them into the mainstream with support for standard programming languages, major speed gains, and quantum-resistant security. The post Proof-based general-purpose computing with Magnetar appeared first on Microsoft Research.
MIT News · Artificial Intelligence· news.mit.eduSep 24, 2026