Atomic-scale phase imaging is central to resolving defects, interfaces, and weakly scattering atoms that govern the behavior of nanoscale materials. Electron ptychography delivers sub-{\aa}ngstr\"om phase sensitivity but remains an offline technique, because its iterative reconstruction is computationally expensive and sensitive to experimental calibration, preventing live use during data acquisition. Here, a ptychography-supervised local inference framework is presented that converts four-dimensional scanning transmission electron microscopy (4D-STEM) into an acquisition-compatible phase-imaging workflow. Physics-constrained reference phase maps reconstructed from a single experimental AuPd dataset serve as teacher labels for a compact model that predicts local phase patches directly from diffraction measurements, without explicit probe input or online iterative optimization. Full-field images are assembled by deterministic overlap stitching. The workflow reaches an online latency of about 0.27 ms per probe position and a throughput of about 20,000 positions per second, an approximately 1,000-fold speed-up over GPU-accelerated ePIE, while preserving atomic-scale lattice contrast and reciprocal-space fidelity. Without fine-tuning, the same model transfers across materials (WS2), defocus conditions (high-entropy alloy nanoparticles), and instruments (hBN at 300 kV). The approach amortizes ptychographic redundancy into a fast, generalizable workflow that enables real-time atomic-scale phase imaging for materials microscopy.
Atomic-scale strain governs the electronic, ferroic and mechanical properties of materials, and atomic-resolution microscopy measures it most directly. Geometric phase analysis (GPA) is the standard tool, but it fails when a Bragg reflection moves outside its fixed Fourier aperture under large strain or rotation, or in...
Quantitative phase imaging (QPI), as a label-free microscopic imaging technique, provides quantitative optical information of cells and their subcellular structures, holding significant value in biomedical research. However, existing methods still face a notable trade-off between resolution and data efficiency. Differe...
Gui-Feng Lu, Zhuo-Shi Li, Qing-Yang Fu et al.· Global Intelligent Industry...· 0 citations
Quantitative phase microscopy (QPM) provides sensitive, label-free measurements of optical-path-length variations in transparent and weakly scattering specimens, offering valuable insights into biological structures without exogenous labels. However, its lateral resolution remains fundamentally constrained by optical d...
Yuan-Yuan Huang, Hao-Yu Li, Xiang-Yan Ding et al.· Journal of Physics: Photonic...· 0 citations
Scanning probe microscopy (SPM) has become a mainstay of materials science, condensed matter physics, nanotechnology, biology, and semiconductor metrology. An SPM image, however, is acquired sequentially as the probe traverses the surface under closed-loop feedback while thermal drift, feedback dynamics, tip state, mec...
Surya Prakash Reddy, Sergei V. Kalinin· 0 citations
Combinatorial materials libraries provide an efficient route for mapping composition–property relationships, but their broader impact depends on rapid, quantitative, and functionally relevant characterization. Scanning Probe Microscopy (SPM), including piezoresponse force microscopy (PFM), offers significant potential...
Yu Liu, Rohit K. Pant, Ichiro Takeuchi et al.· Journal of Applied Physics· 0 citations
Three-dimensional (3D) chemical characterization at the transistor level is increasingly required for root-cause failure analysis (FA) of advanced semiconductor devices, whose yield-limiting defects are intrinsically volumetric. Multimodal electron tomography combining high-angle annular dark-field (HAADF) scanning/t...
Ajinkya A. Kadu, Maadhav Kothari, Mritunjay Prasad et al.· International Symposium for...· 0 citations
We use cookies to run the site and, with your consent, for analytics and to show ads.
See our Cookie Policy.