Aug 2026· Digital War· Vol 7· 0 citations· 52 references
TL;DR
To continue exposing AI-driven military violence, OSI practices must reorient their methodologies and focus more systemically and systematically on the dispersed material infrastructures and political forces underpinning AI militarism, so investigators can better reveal concealed networks of accountability linking state and corporate actors.
Abstract
This paper explores how the integration of artificial intelligence (AI) into military decision-making poses new challenges to human rights focused open-source investigation (OSI). It identifies three key epistemic risks emerging from AI’s role in the military ecosystem. Across these risk areas, AI’s perceived neutrality and rationality create feedback loops of impunity, where human oversight is symbolic or compromised—obscuring both the messy realities of warfare and the potential culpability of military decision-makers. The paper then argues that to continue exposing AI-driven military violence, OSI practices must reorient their methodologies. Rather than treating AI as a discrete, technical tool, OSI must focus more systemically and systematically on the dispersed material infrastructures and political forces underpinning AI militarism. By refocusing investigative practices onto these systems, investigators can better reveal concealed networks of accountability linking state and corporate actors. Such a shift also enables OSI to move beyond narrow legalistic frameworks and engage with structural forms of violence that often evade formal accountability. This could support more expansive, justice-oriented investigations—amplifying marginalised perspectives, mapping complicity, and aligning OSI with broader struggles against systemic harm. Detached from the procedural demands of law, OSI can become a more active, politically mobilising practice, amplifying marginalised perspectives, mapping networks of complicity, and supporting grassroots struggles for justice beyond the courtroom.
The article demonstrates how attempts to decentre the human often reconstitute new forms of authority in attempts to decentre the human and examines the possibility of surpassing standard anthropocentric approaches in AI while maintaining a critical philosophical engagement with the structurally necessary yet precariou...
It is argued that epistemic activism constitutes a key weapon in the AI subaltern’s arsenal, and that recognising how it is wielded by peers may help develop a sense of political consciousness.
Ismael Kherroubi Garcia· AI and Ethics· 1 citation
It is argued that current benchmarking practices may perpetuate systematic harms affecting various actors in AI research, aligning with four of Iris Marion Young's theories of oppression and structural injustice.
Jason Branford, Angelie Kraft· Proceedings of the AAAI/ACM...· 0 citations
Artificial intelligence (AI) has become a double-edged force in contemporary mass communication, enabling media innovation while accelerating the production and circulation of synthetic misinformation, particularly deepfakes. This paper examines the paradoxical role of AI in both facilitating and countering AI-generate...
Everlyn Chelang’at Kimibei· Kabarak Journal of Research...· 0 citations
The paper argues that administrative law, procurement reform, and algorithmic impact assessment remain necessary but insufficient when agencies lack substitutive capacity and specifies untangling as a systems-level task involving capacity reconstruction, categorical repatriation, contractual restructuring, and procurem...
Debates on catastrophic artificial intelligence (AI) risk often frame artificial superintelligence as a problem of value alignment: the central task is to ensure that advanced systems act in accordance with human intentions or moral principles. This article argues that such a framing is necessary but insufficient. The...
C. Burelli, Federico Formentini· European Journal of Politica...· 0 citations
We use cookies to run the site and, with your consent, for analytics and to show ads.
See our Cookie Policy.