Skip to content
Open access

Clouds of impunity: AI militarism, big tech, and the future of human rights open-source investigation

Aug 2026 · Digital War · Vol 7 · 0 citations · 52 references

TL;DR

To continue exposing AI-driven military violence, OSI practices must reorient their methodologies and focus more systemically and systematically on the dispersed material infrastructures and political forces underpinning AI militarism, so investigators can better reveal concealed networks of accountability linking state and corporate actors.

Abstract

This paper explores how the integration of artificial intelligence (AI) into military decision-making poses new challenges to human rights focused open-source investigation (OSI). It identifies three key epistemic risks emerging from AI’s role in the military ecosystem. Across these risk areas, AI’s perceived neutrality and rationality create feedback loops of impunity, where human oversight is symbolic or compromised—obscuring both the messy realities of warfare and the potential culpability of military decision-makers. The paper then argues that to continue exposing AI-driven military violence, OSI practices must reorient their methodologies. Rather than treating AI as a discrete, technical tool, OSI must focus more systemically and systematically on the dispersed material infrastructures and political forces underpinning AI militarism. By refocusing investigative practices onto these systems, investigators can better reveal concealed networks of accountability linking state and corporate actors. Such a shift also enables OSI to move beyond narrow legalistic frameworks and engage with structural forms of violence that often evade formal accountability. This could support more expansive, justice-oriented investigations—amplifying marginalised perspectives, mapping complicity, and aligning OSI with broader struggles against systemic harm. Detached from the procedural demands of law, OSI can become a more active, politically mobilising practice, amplifying marginalised perspectives, mapping networks of complicity, and supporting grassroots struggles for justice beyond the courtroom.

Read PDF

Similar papers

Open access Jul 2026

Off-Centre AI

The article demonstrates how attempts to decentre the human often reconstitute new forms of authority in attempts to decentre the human and examines the possibility of surpassing standard anthropocentric approaches in AI while maintaining a critical philosophical engagement with the structurally necessary yet precariou...

M. Fazi · 0 citations
#generative ai Open access Sep 2026

The golden thread of AI subalternity: epistemic activism

It is argued that epistemic activism constitutes a key weapon in the AI subaltern’s arsenal, and that recognising how it is wielded by peers may help develop a sense of political consciousness.

Ismael Kherroubi Garcia · 1 citation
Open access Aug 2026

ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE AND THE BATTLE FOR AUTHENTICITY: SAFEGUARDING TRUTH IN THE DIGITAL AGE

Artificial intelligence (AI) has become a double-edged force in contemporary mass communication, enabling media innovation while accelerating the production and circulation of synthetic misinformation, particularly deepfakes. This paper examines the paradoxical role of AI in both facilitating and countering AI-generate...

Everlyn Chelang’at Kimibei · 0 citations
Review Open access Jul 2026

Untangling the Algorithmic Leviathan: Palantir, the Post-Factual Polity, and the Infrastructural Crisis of AI Governance in Public Administration

The paper argues that administrative law, procurement reform, and algorithmic impact assessment remain necessary but insufficient when agencies lack substitutive capacity and specifies untangling as a systems-level task involving capacity reconstruction, categorical repatriation, contractual restructuring, and procurem...

Haris Alibašić · 2 citations
Open access Aug 2026

Fear, power, and superintelligence: A realist reframing of AI catastrophic risk

Debates on catastrophic artificial intelligence (AI) risk often frame artificial superintelligence as a problem of value alignment: the central task is to ensure that advanced systems act in accordance with human intentions or moral principles. This article argues that such a framing is necessary but insufficient. The...

C. Burelli, Federico Formentini · 0 citations

We use cookies to run the site and, with your consent, for analytics and to show ads. See our Cookie Policy.