Jul 2026· Journal of Information, Communication and Ethics in Society· pp. 1-25· 0 citations· 90 references
TL;DR
The most influential factor in ethical AI development is “Autonomy and human bias,” followed by “Intentionality and responsibility,” followed by “Intentionality and responsibility”; the “Automation and replacement” factor was ranked the least influential.
Abstract
This study aims to explore the ethical dilemmas posed by generative artificial intelligence (AI) and frames a responsible development framework for AI. It studies influential factors in ethical AI development. The primary study further discusses concerns about data privacy, autonomy and accountability in the context of generative AI systems.
The suggested framework then relies on gray influence analysis (GINA) to assess the degree of influence, which is essential to ethical AI development. It identifies eight key factors, which include transparency, accountability and human bias, as important for ethical AI development. The framework focuses on interventions through GINA to reduce bias and achieve equal AI systems.
This study shows that the most influential factor in ethical AI development is “Autonomy and human bias,” followed by “Intentionality and responsibility.” In contrast, the “Automation and replacement” factor was ranked the least influential.
These factors are systematically considered, with stakeholders developing strategies to facilitate ethical AI development and societal welfare. Future research directions would include the necessary competencies and resources for controlling generative AI, studies of biases in training data sets and the identification of optimal contexts for the deployment of generative AI systems.
This study uniquely explores and identifies influential factors in ethical AI development to address bias and advance fairness.
A Multi-Layer Social-Theoretical AI Ethics Framework (MLST-AEF) that integrates normative ethical reasoning, stakeholder analysis, institutional context, bias and power assessment, and structured decision support is developed.
M. Fakrudeen, J. Otieno· AI and Ethics· 0 citations
It is indicated that heightened competition can weaken the influence of ethical oversight, even in organisations with established responsible AI practices, even in organisations with established responsible AI practices.
Victor Frimpong· International Journal of App...· 0 citations
The model proposes that neither competency alone is sufficient for responsible AI practice and that their combination enables public relations professionals to advocate not only for organizational publics, but for humanity as the emergent public of the AI age.
This study examines the ethical challenges of Human–AI co-creation through a literature review and proposes a conceptual framework encompassing fairness, accountability, transparency, privacy, intellectual property protection, trustworthiness, and human oversight.
Seshagiri N· International Journal of Inn...· 0 citations
It is suggested in the paper that a methodology of ethical governance based on principles of responsible AI should be structured, fairness-by-design, transparency, human-in-the-loop oversight, and constant impact assessment, which underscores the fact that AI systems have ethical failures that are seldom technical but...
Fatou Diop· International Journal of Inn...· 0 citations
The study presents the T-STAEF (Temporal Socio-Technical AI Ethics Framework) to provide a temporal socio-technical lens to view the ethical management of AI systems and provides structural, conceptual model to assist organisations in understanding why there are consistent ethical issues related to AI.
Ahmad Ali· AI and Ethics· 0 citations
We use cookies to run the site and, with your consent, for analytics and to show ads.
See our Cookie Policy.