Skip to content

Ethical horizons in generative AI: addressing bias and advancing fairness through responsible frameworks

Jul 2026 · Journal of Information, Communication and Ethics in Society · pp. 1-25 · 0 citations · 90 references

TL;DR

The most influential factor in ethical AI development is “Autonomy and human bias,” followed by “Intentionality and responsibility,” followed by “Intentionality and responsibility”; the “Automation and replacement” factor was ranked the least influential.

Abstract

This study aims to explore the ethical dilemmas posed by generative artificial intelligence (AI) and frames a responsible development framework for AI. It studies influential factors in ethical AI development. The primary study further discusses concerns about data privacy, autonomy and accountability in the context of generative AI systems. The suggested framework then relies on gray influence analysis (GINA) to assess the degree of influence, which is essential to ethical AI development. It identifies eight key factors, which include transparency, accountability and human bias, as important for ethical AI development. The framework focuses on interventions through GINA to reduce bias and achieve equal AI systems. This study shows that the most influential factor in ethical AI development is “Autonomy and human bias,” followed by “Intentionality and responsibility.” In contrast, the “Automation and replacement” factor was ranked the least influential. These factors are systematically considered, with stakeholders developing strategies to facilitate ethical AI development and societal welfare. Future research directions would include the necessary competencies and resources for controlling generative AI, studies of biases in training data sets and the identification of optimal contexts for the deployment of generative AI systems. This study uniquely explores and identifies influential factors in ethical AI development to address bias and advance fairness.

View source

Similar papers

Open access Aug 2026

A multi-layer social-theoretical framework for AI ethics

A Multi-Layer Social-Theoretical AI Ethics Framework (MLST-AEF) that integrates normative ethical reasoning, stakeholder analysis, institutional context, bias and power assessment, and structured decision support is developed.

M. Fakrudeen, J. Otieno · 0 citations
Review Open access 2025

Ethical Challenges in Human–AI Co-Creation Processes

This study examines the ethical challenges of Human–AI co-creation through a literature review and proposes a conceptual framework encompassing fairness, accountability, transparency, privacy, intellectual property protection, trustworthiness, and human oversight.

Seshagiri N · 0 citations
Review Open access 2018

Ethical Implications of AI-Driven Decision Making in Society

It is suggested in the paper that a methodology of ethical governance based on principles of responsible AI should be structured, fairness-by-design, transparency, human-in-the-loop oversight, and constant impact assessment, which underscores the fact that AI systems have ethical failures that are seldom technical but...

Fatou Diop · 0 citations
Review Aug 2026

Rethinking AI ethics as a temporal socio-technical system: a critical synthesis

The study presents the T-STAEF (Temporal Socio-Technical AI Ethics Framework) to provide a temporal socio-technical lens to view the ethical management of AI systems and provides structural, conceptual model to assist organisations in understanding why there are consistent ethical issues related to AI.

Ahmad Ali · 0 citations

We use cookies to run the site and, with your consent, for analytics and to show ads. See our Cookie Policy.