Aug 2026· International Journal of Applied Research in Business and Management· Vol 7· 0 citations
TL;DR
It is indicated that heightened competition can weaken the influence of ethical oversight, even in organisations with established responsible AI practices, even in organisations with established responsible AI practices.
Abstract
This study explores the governance tensions among Google, OpenAI, Meta, and Microsoft, focusing on how competitive AI development can lead to the ethics suppression. The study aims to examine how ethical oversight loses practical influence even when responsible AI structures are formally in place, especially during rapid technological competition. Despite the rapid growth of responsible AI frameworks and ethical principles in the tech sector, there has been less focus on how these concerns are actually applied when pressure to deploy increases. This paper introduces the concept of ethics suppression in AI development, highlighting that while ethical oversight may exist on paper, its practical authority can diminish during decision-making. Using a comparative qualitative case study examining corporate governance documents, public statements, and reports on governance issues, we identify common issues such as reduced authority, a weakened ability to escalate concerns, urgency in deployment, and fragmented governance. Our findings indicate that heightened competition can weaken the influence of ethical oversight, even in organisations with established responsible AI practices. By differentiating ethics suppression from ethics washing, it offers a framework for organisations and policymakers to evaluate the effectiveness of ethical oversight in competitive AI development
It is argued that listing AI ethical principles takes the centre stage as a shorthand to mitigate the adverse impacts of a technology understood as a predetermined artefact and paradigmatic inevitability.
P. Priyadarshi, Manohar Kumar· Studies in Indian Politics· 0 citations
BACKGROUND
Artificial intelligence (AI) is increasingly integrated into research across disciplines, raising various ethical concerns related to bias, privacy, transparency, and accountability. However, less is known about how these challenges are addressed within research ethics review practices. This paper examines h...
M. Žuljević, Antonija Mijatović, L. D'Andrea et al.· Accountability in Research· 0 citations
This article contends that Shadow AI is more than just a Cybersecurity or compliance issue; it is also an ethical governance problem because hidden use obscures accountability, reduces transparency, shifts responsibility onto individual workers, and gives rise to concerns regarding privacy, fairness, and the need for h...
Alfredo Gavito Romero, V. López-Morales, A. Franco-Árcega et al.· AI and Ethics· 0 citations
This systematic review explores qualitative research ethics by framing GenAI as a new vulnerability layered over traditional principles such as participant autonomy, non-maleficence, researcher positionality, and institutional oversight, and recommends targeted strategies tailored to each research context.
Peruce Atingo, R. Burugu· EPRA International Journal o...· 0 citations
The rapid integration of artificial intelligence (AI) into various aspects of society has raised pressing ethical concerns, from privacy and fairness to autonomy and safety. In response, the field of AI ethics has grown significantly, with a particular focus on developing guidelines to support the responsible developme...
Astrid Schomäcker, Timo Speith, Luca Deck et al.· AI and Ethics· 0 citations
The findings highlight key governance concerns within a national and international AI hub, revealing limits to practitioner influence and the need to legitimate emerging voices and networks in AI governance.
F. McKelvey, Katalin Fehér, Lindsay Rodgers et al.· Canadian Journal of Communic...· 0 citations
We use cookies to run the site and, with your consent, for analytics and to show ads.
See our Cookie Policy.