This review shows that developing CNS expertise from novice to expert requires education, clinical experience, and continuous professional support, while further research on support strategies and competencies is needed.
Abstract
ABSTRACT Aims and Objectives The mixed‐method review aimed to synthesize research on how clinical nurse specialists' expertise develops from novice to expert and how this progression can be supported. Methodological Design and Justification The review was conducted in accordance with the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta‐Analyses (PRISMA) and was registered on PROSPERO. A mixed‐methods approach was used to combine qualitative and quantitative data and enhance the robustness of the findings. Research Methods Literature search was conducted in CINAHL, PubMed and Scopus in September 2024. The selection and quality assessment of the studies were performed using JBI critical appraisal tools. The synthesis was based on qualitative and quantitative studies, using Benner's ‘From Novice to Expert’ model as a framework. Ethical Issues and Approval Ethical approval was not required for this study. Outcome Measures The main outcomes were stages of expertise development and factors supporting progression. Results Eleven articles were included for review. Becoming a clinical nurse specialist requires a basic nursing degree, clinical experience and a higher education degree. According to the results, expertise was seen to develop through three stages: novice, competent and expert, with the support of organizations, mentors, colleagues and multi‐professional collaboration. Pursuing continuing education while gaining experience is essential to carry on the journey towards expertise. Study Limitations The study screening process may have introduced selection bias, potentially leading to the omission of relevant articles. Additionally, selected articles on other interventions, such as service development, were excluded. However, they could have provided further insights into development. Conclusions This review shows that developing CNS expertise from novice to expert requires education, clinical experience, and continuous professional support. Strengthening structures and collaboration enhances patient care, while further research on support strategies and competencies is needed.
Evidence suggests that APN-led models of care may be associated with favorable patient, family, and health system outcomes in Thailand, but these findings should be interpreted cautiously because the evidence was derived predominantly from non-randomized and observational studies, and the independent effects of APN pra...
Understanding patients' lived experiences of advanced practice nursing can help nurses and healthcare organizations strengthen patient-centred care and highlight the importance of protecting time for listening, supporting clear and individualized communication, building trustful partnerships, encouraging patient partic...
Qin Hu, Wei-Yan Tan, Shan-Shan Liu et al.· Journal of Nursing Scholarsh...· 0 citations
A model is developed that illustrates how the interplay between personal, organisational and cultural factors determines whether nurses’ clinically relevant observations are acknowledged and integrated into medical treatment decisions.
V. W, Stoffels M, Kusurkar R. A. et al.· BMJ Open· 0 citations
Qualitative evidence suggests that registered nurses perceive GAI as a potentially supportive tool for improving efficiency, assisting clinical and research decision-making, and promoting professional development.
Yan Deng, Yidan Zhu, Jiaqi Li et al.· Frontiers in Public Health· 0 citations
The findings from this review suggest that confidence‐building strategies are most effective when supported by psychologically safe unit cultures, protected preceptor time, constructive feedback, manageable workloads, and structured opportunities for reflection and team integration.
Justin Fontenot, Fu-Qin Liu, J. Immanuel· Journal of Nursing Managemen...· 0 citations
Introduction Programmatic assessment (PA) is widely endorsed as a way to organize assessment around competency development in postgraduate medical education (PGME), yet no systematic review has synthesized the empirical evidence in this setting. We therefore synthesized the evidence on its contribution to competency de...
İbrahim Ulaş Özturan, Pinar Daylan, Cansu Alyeşil Özturan et al.· Frontiers in Medicine· 0 citations
We use cookies to run the site and, with your consent, for analytics and to show ads.
See our Cookie Policy.