Aug 2026· Artificial Intelligence Review· 0 citations
TL;DR
This survey re-examines deep learning models for MTS forecasting through the requirements of efficiency and explainability, and identifies key open challenges including the absence of standardized explainability benchmarks for time series, the interpretability gap in state space models, and the need to advance from correlational to causal explanations.
Abstract
The rapid expansion of multivariate time series (MTS) data has made deep learning a central tool for forecasting across industrial and scientific domains. As these architectures move into settings such as clinical decision support, industrial monitoring, and financial risk management, researchers need to examine not only predictive accuracy but also computational cost and the kinds of explanations that a model can support. This survey re-examines deep learning models for MTS forecasting through the requirements of efficiency and explainability. Our contributions are threefold: (1) We synthesize the literature through a dual-axis scalability view over sequence length
L
and variate dimension
N
, together with a three-question explainability taxonomy covering temporal importance, variate importance, and pattern decomposition. (2) We review dominant architectural families, including Transformer variants, frequency-domain methods, linear and channel-independent backbones, state space models, and foundation-style forecasters, to describe how different designs occupy different efficiency–explainability profiles under specific data and deployment assumptions. (3) Building on this synthesis, we identify key open challenges—including the absence of standardized explainability benchmarks for time series, the interpretability gap in state space models, and the need to advance from correlational to causal explanations—and offer reporting considerations to guide more comparable future research.
Forecasting time series over long horizons is essential for proactive decision-making in many systems. Recent research has focused on transformer-based architectures, which capture long-range dependencies in sequential data. However, several studies show that simpler linear models can outperform transformers by avoidin...
P. F. Pérez, Claudio Fiandrino, Marco Fiore et al.· La Main· 0 citations
The literature is organized around five recurring difficulties: nonlinear and nonstationary behavior, contamination and structural breaks, uncertainty, long contexts and cross-variable dependence, and limited target-domain data.
Chu-Ting Wen· Applied and Computational En...· 0 citations
EFFECTS is introduced, a scalable framework for extracting interpretable temporal features that enable model-agnostic explanations of black-box classifiers and also support the construction of inherently interpretable models.
Ido Ikar, Amit Somech· Proceedings of the 32nd ACM...· 0 citations
This study compares ARIMA, LSTM, and temporal fusion transformer (TFT) models across three applications and shows that TFT consistently achieved superior forecasting performance and demonstrated greater robustness to increasing missingness, while k-NN generally provided the most effective imputation performance across...
M. Hosseini, Mohamad Forouzanfar· Computer Science and Informa...· 0 citations
The findings demonstrate that rigorous leakage-free validation is essential for reliable forecasting research and that, for monthly Robusta coffee prices, increased model complexity does not necessarily yield superior predictive performance.
Dler H Kadir, D. Khalil, Azhin M. Khudhur· Forecasting· 0 citations
The results indicate that self-supervised representation learning can serve as an effective and scalable substitute for manual feature engineering in finance time-series forecasting.
M. Pawar· International Journal of Ada...· 0 citations
We use cookies to run the site and, with your consent, for analytics and to show ads.
See our Cookie Policy.