Aug 2026· Applied and Computational Engineering· 0 citations
TL;DR
The literature is organized around five recurring difficulties: nonlinear and nonstationary behavior, contamination and structural breaks, uncertainty, long contexts and cross-variable dependence, and limited target-domain data.
Abstract
Surveys of time series forecasting usually proceed by model family, from recurrent networks to Transformers and foundation models. That chronology is useful, but it gives limited guidance when the practical question is why a forecast fails. This article instead organizes the literature around five recurring difficulties: nonlinear and nonstationary behavior, contamination and structural breaks, uncertainty, long contexts and cross-variable dependence, and limited target-domain data. Studies published between 2014–2025 are compared through the assumptions they make, the settings in which they work, and the failure modes they leave unresolved. The review covers recurrent and probabilistic models, decomposition methods, robust and uncertainty-aware forecasting, Transformer variants, theory-guided methods, and foundation models. Quantitative results are used only when the underlying protocol is sufficiently clear. Across these families, the evidence supports a restrained workflow: begin with a strong simple baseline, identify the dominant source of error, and add complexity only when it addresses that source.
It is argued that modern methods make progress by expanding the classical forecasting template: they allow more flexible dynamics, use larger information sets and training corpora, and represent richer predictive distributions, yet they often lack the inferential and structural tools that make classical models useful f...
This work proposes CvLoss, a plug-in structural regularizer that constrains forecast residuals on a cross-variable graph and shows that CvLoss consistently improves competitive forecasting models, outperforms representative learning objectives, and is compatible with a variety of forecasting backbones.
Kuiye Ding, Yifan Hu, Hanchen Wang et al.· 1 citation
The findings demonstrate that rigorous leakage-free validation is essential for reliable forecasting research and that, for monthly Robusta coffee prices, increased model complexity does not necessarily yield superior predictive performance.
Dler H Kadir, D. Khalil, Azhin M. Khudhur· Forecasting· 0 citations
This survey re-examines deep learning models for MTS forecasting through the requirements of efficiency and explainability, and identifies key open challenges including the absence of standardized explainability benchmarks for time series, the interpretability gap in state space models, and the need to advance from cor...
Forecasting time series over long horizons is essential for proactive decision-making in many systems. Recent research has focused on transformer-based architectures, which capture long-range dependencies in sequential data. However, several studies show that simpler linear models can outperform transformers by avoidin...
P. F. Pérez, Claudio Fiandrino, Marco Fiore et al.· La Main· 0 citations
This study evaluates multiple forecasting models, ranging from HAR and GARCH to Tree-based and Neural architectures, across 14 Global Equity Indices and Horizons form 1 day to 100 Trading days within a strictly chronological and capacity-controlled framework, indicating that for strongly dependent time series, nominal...