Skip to content
Open access

A robust framework integrating random standard deviation sampling with machine learning for volatile fatty acids prediction in Fe3O4-mediated high-load anaerobic fermentation.

Aug 2026 · Bioresource Technology · pp. 135660 · 0 citations · 36 references
Medicine

Abstract

Predicting volatile fatty acids (VFAs) in Fe3O4-mediated high-load anaerobic fermentation (AF) is hindered by stochastic uncertainty and intrinsic data scarcity. To bridge the gap between the lab-scale datasets and industrial prediction demands, this study established the RSDS-ML framework integrating random standard deviation sampling (RSDS) with four machine learning (ML) models-K-Nearest Neighbors (KNN), Support Vector Regression (SVR), Random Forest (RF), and Extreme Gradient Boosting (XGBoost). The raw experimental data (30 points) was randomly partitioned into a training set (80%) and a testing set (20%). Subsequently, the training set was enriched by merging the 80% raw samples expanded via RSDS (expanded limited data to 500-15,000) with the supplementary data (18 points) via Piecewise Cubic Hermite Interpolating Polynomial, which was defined as 'name of ML-Data samples'. Results indicate that the primary KNN-500, SVR-10000 and XGBoost-1000 models are the optimal frameworks, achieving a testing set R2 more than 0.80. Crucially, a secondary fitting strategy was adopted by selecting easily monitored indicators (soluble carbohydrate, soluble proteins, pH, NH4+-N, and organic loading rates), which maintained high predictive accuracy (R2 = 0.8725) via SVR-10000-2 model, where the suffix '-2' explicitly designates the secondary 'lightweight' SVR model trained on the same data volume (10,000 samples) but using only the 5 selected easily monitored features. Summarily, RSDS-ML effectively captures nonlinear features from virtual data, extending the applicability of data-driven modeling to small-sample AF processes. This robust framework not only maintains prediction accuracy but also achieves significance for reducing both experimental workloads and temporal costs.

Read PDF

We use cookies to run the site and, with your consent, for analytics and to show ads. See our Cookie Policy.