Mint-Agent, a family of finance-native agentic models designed around these two scales of financial intelligence, is presented, establishing a path toward trustworthy financial intelligence in which domain expertise, long-horizon execution, and auditable evidence are jointly engineered as a unified foundation for frontier agentic models.
Abstract
Financial agents must do more than recall domain knowledge: they must be both reliable, executing precise operations over grounded evidence, and executive, sustaining long-horizon research whose conclusions remain auditable. We present Mint-Agent, a family of finance-native agentic models designed around these two scales of financial intelligence. Mint-Agent is built upon three pillars: data, harness, and algorithm. Our data engine constructs clean, specialized tasks for atomic financial capabilities and long-horizon agentic execution from real-world financial sources. MintHarness enables stable interaction with open-ended environments and maintains auditable evidence trails across extended research trajectories. Our training recipe combines SFT, critical-step OPD, and RLVR to develop separate financial reasoning and agentic execution experts, which are then unified through model merging and multi-teacher on-policy distillation into compact, general-purpose financial agents. This pipeline yields two flagship models, Mint-Cu (9B) and Mint-Ag (27B). Across professional financial benchmarks, our models demonstrate two defining strengths: (1) Reliability: Mint-Ag achieves 98.33% on RFC-Bench, surpassing GPT-5.6-Sol and Claude-Opus-4.8 by 3.66 and 3.00 points; and (2) Executability: Mint-Cu reaches 69.86% on FinSearchComp T2, outperforming Agents-A1-35B and Nex-N2-mini by 22.83 and 12.78 points, while Mint-Ag achieves 76.00% and 60.49% on FinanceAgentBench v1.1 and v2, respectively. These results establish a path toward trustworthy financial intelligence in which domain expertise, long-horizon execution, and auditable evidence are jointly engineered as a unified foundation for frontier agentic models.
This work introduces FORCE-Bench, which contains 251 expert-annotated queries and evaluates responses using a rubric-based framework calibrated to the requirements of the operational finance domain, across eight dimensions: accuracy, citations, clarity, depth, groundedness, recency, relevance, and structure.
Wolfgang M. Pauli, Sarah Panda, Kidus Admassu et al.· arXiv.org· 2 citations
Low-friction, expressive membrane prevents harness failures from becoming model failures and pushes measurement toward the model's true maximal underlying capability, on Factorio, where refinement allows for continuous technology progression and dedicated subagents enable parallelized work.
Seth Karten, Alex L. Zhang, Kevin Thomas et al.· 16 citations· ⚡2
This work evaluates SEADS against five re-implemented baselines on two US equity panels using this standard: no single metric ranks the systems consistently, motivating evaluation on multiple axes at once.
Ying-Jian Pan, Xiao-Wei Ding, Kay Giesecke· 0 citations
MASkills presents a new agent-optimization pipeline that integrates skill-conditioned credit assignment, hierarchical credit aggregation, and momentum-smoothed optimization, enabling agent skill libraries to evolve through refinement, induction, consolidation, and pruning.
Huaiyuan Yao, Xia-Oou Liu, Charles Fleming et al.· 1 citation
This paper proposes MSCE, a training-free Memory--Skill Co-Evolution framework that organizes agent experience into grounded step traces, reusable procedural policies, and declarative environmental cognition, and introduces reflection-weighted value backfilling.
Bo Tang, Yang Zhang, Guomian Zhuang et al.· arXiv.org· 1 citation
This work introduces NextFund, an evaluation platform that makes financial-agent behavior observable under live market conditions, and presents NextFund on Hong Kong, U.S., and China A-share equities, illustrating how inspectable decision histories enable fairer benchmarking and more actionable diagnosis.