In latent dynamics, subtracting a prediction's mean effect over actions cancels whatever the actions share--the action-independent variation where distractors live--leaving a clean, controllable channel, with no reward, no reconstruction, and no distractor-specific auxiliary loss.
Abstract
Latent world models plan by predicting future states from an action, but when a scene contains motion the agent does not control, they quietly go action-blind: predictions for different actions become indistinguishable even as the training loss keeps improving. Existing remedies suppress this distraction with reconstruction, task reward, or auxiliary objectives, each adding machinery or assumptions. We show that a minimal alternative suffices, borrowed from the dueling decomposition of value into a state baseline and an action advantage: in latent dynamics, subtracting a prediction's mean effect over actions cancels whatever the actions share--the action-independent variation where distractors live--leaving a clean, controllable channel, with no reward, no reconstruction, and no distractor-specific auxiliary loss. Because this is only a subtraction at readout time, it applies unchanged to any action-conditioned world model, including frozen pretrained ones. Across a gridworld, synthetic generators with known factors, distracting continuous control, and natural-pixel Atari, the isolated channel recovers the agent's own effect where entangled predictors fail, with nuisance leak indistinguishable from zero; applied post hoc it surfaces an action channel in off-the-shelf models that their raw readouts miss, and it converts into goal-reaching control in the gridworld. We prove the cancellation is exact in finite samples for both discrete and sampled action sets, and we state its measured boundary--distractors whose motion tracks the action--together with the remaining limitations in the appendix.
Causal Action Effect Reweighting (CAER), a general training paradigm that redistributes supervision toward the tokens whose predicted future is causally affected by the action, is introduced.
Jian-Jie Fang, Xvyuan Liu, Zi-You Wang et al.· 0 citations
GlanceWAM is introduced, which decouples imagination from control within a single video DiT: an asynchronous proposer glances ahead on a slow clock to imagine a single lookahead frame seconds into the future in the background, while an action head decodes action chunks at control rate purely in latent space without blo...
Lin-Han Wang, Zi-Jian An, Mingyuan Zhang et al.· 3 citations
Action-Conditioned Predictive Consistency (ACPC), a diagnostic that measures how far a clean history and a visually perturbed view of it diverge after being rolled forward under the same action sequence, is introduced and it is proved that this divergence bounds the perturbation-induced change in multi-step prediction...
Guo An, Zijing Wu, Hongzhuang Dong et al.· 3 citations
This work introduces the Counterfactual Quotient Model, which treats action-conditioned futures as equivalent when they differ only by a component shared across actions, and establishes the decision sufficiency, identifiability, common-mode invariance, approximation behavior, and regret properties of the resulting repr...
This work extends contrastive reinforcement learning (CRL), a prototypical self-supervised method, to operate over action chunks, and finds that this results in large, pervasive gains across established offline and online benchmarks: +31.7% and +93.1% across 18 and 11 environments respectively.
Michal Korniak, Kamil Dybek, Benjamin Eysenbach et al.· 3 citations· ⚡1
Contrastive inverse dynamics thus provides a distribution-free anti-collapse signal that requires no target network, stop-gradient, pretrained encoder, or reconstruction objective, and it is argued that the anti-collapse pressure can instead come from the transition data itself.
Jack Boylan, Chris Hokamp· 6 citations
We use cookies to run the site and, with your consent, for analytics and to show ads.
See our Cookie Policy.