Skip to content
Review Open access

Cognitive Readiness for Human-AI Collaboration.

Aug 2026 · Human Factors · pp. 187208261474345 · 0 citations · 220 references
Medicine

TL;DR

Communication inflexibility, limited shared understanding, and trust miscalibration emerge as recurring barriers to HAT, while regulatory capacities represent particularly critical dimensions of HAT readiness that remain to be fully operationalized.

Abstract

ObjectiveThis narrative review examines the cognitive, metacognitive, and team competency requirements that may contribute to productive and reliable collaboration between human and AI to address two questions: What capabilities make AI a competent collaborator? What makes humans ready for AI collaboration?BackgroundAs AI systems are increasingly integrated into workplaces and framed as teammates rather than tools, humans face challenges that include maintaining situation awareness, calibrating trust, and working with systems that may surpass them cognitively. We analyzed Human-Agent Teaming (HAT) readiness around two complementary levels: operational team competencies (communication, coordination, and adaptability) and regulatory capacities (trust calibration and metacognitive awareness).MethodWe conducted a structured narrative review of literature from 2010 through January 2026, searching Google Scholar, Scopus, PsycINFO, IEEE Xplore, ACM Digital Library, and Semantic Scholar, complemented by forward citation tracking. After screening 572 records, 192 articles were included for synthesis.ResultsCommunication inflexibility, limited shared understanding, and trust miscalibration emerge as recurring barriers to HAT, while regulatory capacities (trust calibration and metacognitive awareness) represent particularly critical dimensions of HAT readiness that remain to be fully operationalized.ConclusionHAT requires mutual readiness, with both humans and AI developing metacognitive and adaptive capabilities. Despite methodological heterogeneity limiting clear conclusions, cross-training and co-learning methods offer a promising avenue for building shared understanding and calibrated collaboration.ApplicationThis review provides practical principles for designing AI systems that support calibrated collaboration and for preparing humans to work adaptively with AI, thereby enhancing team effectiveness, reliability, and resilience in collaborative work environments.

Read PDF

Similar papers

Aug 2026

From Tools to Teammates: Designing Human-AI Collaboration in Innovation Work

This article synthesizes recent scholarship and practitioner experience into a structured playbook for executives, design leaders, and human resources partners that argues that the value of HAIC depends on three deliberate design choices: who initiates the collaboration, how broad the AI's knowledge scope must be, and...

Jonathan H. Westover · 0 citations
Review Open access Aug 2026

Human–AI Teaming in Modern Organizations: A Framework for Collaborative Intelligence

The study argues that collaborative intelligence should be viewed as an organizational capability rather than merely a technological outcome, requiring deliberate management of human judgment, ethical responsibility, and organizational design.

M. R · 0 citations
Open access Aug 2026

Old Theories, New Teams: Advancing Team Adaptation Theory for Human-Autonomy-Teams

This work identifies four key conditions—predictability, observability, plannability, and directability—that govern how HATs respond to shifting interdependencies and proposes a holistic framework that integrates the dynamic interplay between team members, tasks, and the environment.

Tilman Nols, Anna‐Sophie Ulfert, J. Gevers · 0 citations
Review Aug 2026

How Agentic AI Reshapes Work: The Roles of Cognitive Surplus, Psychological Safety, and AI-Human Task Reallocation.

Structural results were consistent with the theorized resource-gain model: AITC was positively associated with cognitive surplus, psychological safety, and task reallocation, with significant mediation pathways and stronger AITC-resource associations among leaders.

J. Han, Cheong Kim · 0 citations
#explainable ai Review Open access Sep 2026

Beyond Transparency: Reframing Ethical Explainability in Human–AI Teams

The study proposes the Sociotechnical Explainability Alignment (SEA) framework, which conceptualizes ethical XAI as requiring alignment across four levels: design, user, team, and organization.

Hoda Parvaneh Shirazi, A. Al-Asfour, Sami El Ahmadie et al. · 0 citations
Open access Aug 2026

The Metacognitive Paradox of AI-Assisted Creativity: A Theoretical Extension

The metacognitive paradox framework is developed to explain this phenomenon: AI tools designed to augment human creativity may inadvertently suppress the very cognitive processes that sustain independent creative capacity.

Jonathan H. Westover · 0 citations

We use cookies to run the site and, with your consent, for analytics and to show ads. See our Cookie Policy.