Skip to content
#small language model Book Open access

STACK: 3D Spatial Task Analysis in Collaborative Construction Keyframes

Oct 2026 · Proceedings of the 28th International Conference On Multimodal Interaction · 0 citations · 39 references

TL;DR

STACK is presented, to the knowledge the first benchmark pairing real multi-party construction video with dense 3D annotations and goal-paired judgment, exposing a gap between perception and judgment in current VLMs and informing their use as analyzers of collaborative group dynamics.

Abstract

Analyzing multi-party physical collaboration means tracking what a group builds and whether their actions move the shared structure toward a goal. Vision-Language Models (VLMs) could automate this analysis from session recordings, but existing spatial-reasoning benchmarks use rendered scenes or curated snapshots, not real collaborative video. We present STACK, to our knowledge the first benchmark pairing real multi-party construction video with dense 3D annotations and goal-paired judgment. Using 237 keyframes from 19 LEGO sessions, we evaluate seven VLMs across input modality, structural complexity, and manipulation judgment. A structured JSON state drives reconstruction accuracy to near-perfect across all models. Rendered views outperform real video frames, while additional viewpoints give only marginal gains. For manipulation judgment, frontier models reach 80–92% accuracy while open 7–8B models stay at chance. A key dissociation emerges. Small open models identify what manipulation happened with structured context but cannot judge whether the result is spatially correct. These findings expose a gap between perception and judgment in current VLMs and inform their use as analyzers of collaborative group dynamics.

Read PDF

Similar papers

#artificial intelligence Preprint Sep 2026

MVVBench: Benchmarking 4D Reasoning in Vision-Language Models

Preliminary evidence is presented that reinforcement learning with verifiable rewards can elicit some latent multi-view competence in the base model, pointing to training-time approaches as a promising direction for future work.

Hyungjin Chung, Byeongjun Park, Joonseok Lee et al. · 0 citations
Preprint Oct 2026

RoTA-Bench: Evaluating 3D Spatial Reasoning through Interactive Projection Alignment

The findings of RoTA-Bench highlight the challenge of converting visual evidence into precise 3D control, beyond recognizing or matching individual images, beyond recognizing or matching individual images.

Qing-Chuan Ma, Yue-Xiao Ma, Xiang Meng et al. · 0 citations
Preprint Oct 2026

Think-Capture: Active 3D Geometry Acquisition for Spatial Reasoning in Vision-Language Models

Vision-Language Models (VLMs) excel at 2D recognition but often fail to maintain consistent 3D relations across sparse viewpoints, leading to spatial hallucinations under occlusion and perspective changes. Existing methods commonly fuse all frames with dense geometry, incurring substantial computation and context overh...

Jun-Jie Wang, Zhi-Hao Yuan, Yun-Han Tang et al. · 0 citations
Open access Sep 2026

LEMuR: Language Embedded 3D Segmentation and Object Tracking for Mixed Reality

This work introduces LEMuR, a language embedded 3D segmentation and tracking pipeline that enables real-time sharing and synchronization of everyday physical objects in MR and examines how LEMuR supports object-mediated gestures, proxemics, and artifact cues, revealing emergent interaction patterns unique to hybrid phy...

Wen-Di Yu, Zhong-Yi Bai, Hong-Yu Zhou et al. · 0 citations
Preprint Sep 2026

EgoTSR++: Egocentric Spatiotemporal Reasoning for Task Progress Understanding

The results establish goal-conditioned state comparison as an explicit formulation of egocentric spatiotemporal reasoning for task-progress understanding as part of a unified framework for diagnosing and improving order-robust task-progress understanding.

Xiao-Da Yang, Can Wang, Yu-Xiang Liu et al. · 0 citations

Related blog posts

MIT News · Artificial Intelligence Oct 23, 2026

Q&A: How AI came to model the “messy” human mind

Assistant Professor Benjamin Lindquist studies how engineers deliberately injected randomness into early AI, giving rise to deep-learning models that sometimes hallucinate.

We use cookies to run the site and, with your consent, for analytics and to show ads. See our Cookie Policy.