Skip to content
Preprint

The Technological Turn in Mathematics

Jul 2026 · 2 citations · 38 references
Mathematics

TL;DR

This chapter explores the implications of these innovations, focusing on their impact on how mathematical knowledge is created and shared, and how they are reshaping the social dimension of mathematics, altering collaboration dynamics, trust relationships, and the collective production of knowledge.

Abstract

Quickly evolving technologies, such as Interactive Theorem Provers (ITPs), Automated Theorem Provers (ATPs), and Large Language Models (LLMs), all falling under the general heading'AI for mathematics,'are transforming mathematical practice in profound ways. This chapter explores the implications of these innovations, focusing on their impact on how mathematical knowledge is created and shared. It also discusses how they are reshaping the social dimension of mathematics, altering collaboration dynamics, trust relationships, and the collective production of knowledge. For instance, tools like ITPs facilitate large-scale collaborations and make new types of teamwork possible, where trust is not a necessary ingredient. ITPs also help us mitigate our human fallibility, yet they raise questions about the nature of formalization and the relationship between traditional and formal mathematics. Technologies such as LLMs are reshaping the division of epistemic labour between humans and machines and urge philosophers of mathematics to ask questions about the value of their work.

View source

Similar papers

Review Jul 2026

From Solvers to Research: Large Language Model-Driven Formal Mathematics at the Research Frontier

It is argued that the next leap in AI4Math systems requires a decisive shift from predefined problem-solvers to research agents that can address frontier mathematical challenges with rigorous formal mathematical reasoning, highlighting core limitations of existing systems in serving as mathematical research agents.

E. Jiang, Xiao Liang, Yikai Zhang et al. · 1 citation
Review Jul 2026

Why Pure Reasoning is Not Enough: Nature as the Source of Mathematical Innovation

We advance the hypothesis that human mathematical reasoning, constrained by both the undecidability and the computational intractability of even modest logical fragments, relies fundamentally on pattern matching from domains external to pure deduction. The most prolific reservoir of such patterns is the natural world,...

C. Jutla, V. Sharma · 0 citations
Preprint Jul 2026

What Remains Human in Mathematics in the Age of AI

Mathematics is often valued for its role as the language of science, but it is equally important as a human practice that teaches us how to think and cultivates creativity, problem-solving skills, attention, and judgment. The rapid rise of modern AI systems, which can solve many standard problems and produce fluent mat...

Amir Moradifam · 0 citations
Preprint Jul 2026

MathCoPilot: An Interactive System for Human-AI Symbiotic Paradigm of Mathematical Research

This paper systematically compares four state-of-the-art LLMs, including Gemini~3.1~Pro, GPT-5.4, and Claude~Opus~4, on a FormalMATH subset and on two real PDE theorems requiring deep domain expertise, evaluating their ability to produce verified Lean~4 proofs and to identify errors in deliberately incorrect proofs.

Junjie Zhang, Jia-Yin Liu, Wenbin Liu et al. · 1 citation
Preprint Jul 2026

Automation Without Understanding

The essay makes the case for treating mathematical capacity as a strategic asset on a par with semiconductor capability and proposes, among other measures, that AI systems performing consequential reasoning be required to expose their decision-critical claims in formal, machine-checkable form.

Jun-yong Park · 0 citations

We use cookies to run the site and, with your consent, for analytics and to show ads. See our Cookie Policy.