Skip to content
Preprint

NiyamAI - An Intent-Bound AI Agent with Cryptographically Verifiable Guardrails using Zero-Knowledge Proofs

Aug 2026 · 1 citation · 2 references
Computer Science

TL;DR

NiyamAI is presented, an intent bound runtime guardrail architecture providing cryptographically verifiable execution integrity for autonomous agents and subjects its own enforcement mechanism to 18 adversarial vectors across six classes, disclosing two implementation vulnerabilities identified and remediated during development.

Abstract

Autonomous LLM agents with tool execution capabilities introduce severe security risks through prompt injection, goal hijacking, and unauthorized action invocation. Existing guardrails rely on unverified, host local software filters system prompts, semantic classifiers, policy engines that share the execution environment of the untrusted agent, offering no guarantee to an external observer that a safety policy was correctly evaluated. A compromised host produces no evidence of its own failure. This paper presents NiyamAI, an intent bound runtime guardrail architecture providing cryptographically verifiable execution integrity for autonomous agents. At session initialization, permitted tools and operational constraints are sealed into an immutable Intent Contract under a SHA256 commitment. Every tool invocation is intercepted by a deterministic authority gate and classified by a dedicated neural Judge (11->8->2 feedforward network). For each authorized action, NiyamAI generates a succinct zkSNARK proof certifying correct policy evaluation under the committed contract; execution proceeds only after that proof verifies. Across 2,000 AgentSafetyBench scenarios under 5fold stratified crossvalidation with out of fold scoring, NiyamAI achieves 88.8% F1 at a 1.0% false positive rate (bootstrap 95% CI [85.5%, 92.1%]), against 66.8% for Llama Prompt Guard 2, 46.2% for GPTOSSSafeguard, and 40.4% for NeMo Guardrails; McNemar's exact test confirms each margin at p<0.0001. Proof generation adds 1.7 s per approved action, verification 51 ms, with an 18.6 KB proof verifiable by any third party without access to model parameters. We further subject NiyamAI's own enforcement mechanism to 18 adversarial vectors across six classes, disclosing two implementation vulnerabilities identified and remediated during development.

View source

Similar papers

Open access Jul 2026

Cryptographically verifiable authorization for autonomous AI agents: a falsifiable hypothesis and proof of concept

This study hypothesizes that agent authorization can be formalized as a cryptographically verifiable relation that jointly binds an agent principal, a concrete authorization request, an execution context, and the satisfaction of an applicable policy, while selectively preserving the confidentiality of private authoriza...

M. Llambí-Morillas, D. Fernández-Fernández · 0 citations
Open access Sep 2026

Security Architecture for Agentic AI in Enterprise Cloud Environments: A Zero-Trust Framework for Secure Autonomous Systems

Agentic artificial intelligence expands the enterprise security boundary because autonomous agents can plan tasks, retain memory, invoke tools, call APIs, and initiate business actions. Authentication at session start is therefore insufficient when later actions may be influenced by untrusted content, poisoned memory,...

S. Suryawanshi · 0 citations
Preprint Aug 2026

$Z^2$-ACT: End-to-End Verifiable Agentic Intent Control for Open 6G RAN

This work proposes zero-knowledge auditable control and zero-trust verifiable agentic intent architecture ($Z^2$-ACT), which integrates the aforementioned four primitives across the non-real-time and near-real-time RICs.

S. A. Khowaja, K. Dev, George C. Alexandropoulos · 0 citations

We use cookies to run the site and, with your consent, for analytics and to show ads. See our Cookie Policy.