This study hypothesizes that agent authorization can be formalized as a cryptographically verifiable relation that jointly binds an agent principal, a concrete authorization request, an execution context, and the satisfaction of an applicable policy, while selectively preserving the confidentiality of private authorization attributes.
Abstract
Autonomous AI agents increasingly execute actions, invoke tools, and operate on protected resources with limited human oversight. Existing authentication and authorization mechanisms establish identity and delegate authority but do not inherently provide cryptographic evidence that a concrete request issued by a specific agent satisfies the applicable policy in a specific execution context. This study hypothesizes that agent authorization can be formalized as a cryptographically verifiable relation, denoted
R
CVA
, that jointly binds an agent principal, a concrete authorization request, an execution context, and the satisfaction of an applicable policy, while selectively preserving the confidentiality of private authorization attributes. We introduce a preliminary formal abstraction for Cryptographically Verifiable Agent Authorization (CVA), define a compact set of candidate security properties including authorization soundness, principal binding, request binding, policy binding, and replay resistance, and provide an executable zero-knowledge proof of concept that instantiates selected elements of the model over a Groth16 zk-SNARK construction. We further identify and formalize the structural separation among identity binding, authorization-request binding, and runtime execution binding as a central open problem in the design of secure agentic systems, a distinction to our knowledge, has not been formalized within a cryptographically verifiable authorization relation by current agentic security frameworks, and present a falsifiable research agenda for its resolution.
NiyamAI is presented, an intent bound runtime guardrail architecture providing cryptographically verifiable execution integrity for autonomous agents and subjects its own enforcement mechanism to 18 adversarial vectors across six classes, disclosing two implementation vulnerabilities identified and remediated during de...
Aditya Katkar, Om Karkele, Kartik Mandhane et al.· 1 citation
This paper defines an authorization envelope of eight fields drawn from the delegated-authority literature and from the control primitives of existing payment rails, comprising a per-transaction ceiling, a cumulative ceiling, a merchant set, a category set, required product attributes, a validity window, a substitution...
Ian Staley· Journal of Artificial Intell...· 0 citations
KITA is presented, a review-to-authorization architecture that keeps the user's personal secret signing key and every threshold signing-key share outside all LLM processes and establishes execution-bound authorization integrity.
A provenance-bounded runtime authorization architecture that quarantines acquired outputs, resolves their actual capabilities from authenticated provider evidence through a versioned resolver, and activates them only through a current activation transaction that checks the resolved manifest, provenance, epochs, and a d...
Gen-Liang Zhu, Chu Wang Accentrust, Georgia Institute of Technology et al.· 0 citations
This work proposes a framework based on the principles of capability based security with decentralized agent identity whereby agents access services based on tokens that are cryptographically bound to the agent's and issuer's identities and specify their scope.
Tool-using artificial intelligence (AI) agents, systems that autonomously invoke application programming interfaces (APIs), databases, browsers, and inter-agent protocols such as the Model Context Protocol (MCP), are becoming production infrastructure. Yet the security model governing when an agent is authorized to act...