A systematic literature review of eXplainable Artificial Intelligence within the Intelligent and Secure SD-WAN (ISD-WAN) framework and suggests a transition toward a multi-tiered interpretability roadmap, where the depth of the explanation is calibrated to the plane’s processing budget.
Abstract
The paradigm shift toward AI-driven autonomous network orchestration has precipitated a critical strategic vulnerability: the paradox of opaque autonomy. In mission-critical defense environments, the deployment of opaque models for intrusion detection and traffic management poses a severe risk to national security and decision-making accountability. This paper presents a systematic literature review (SLR) of eXplainable Artificial Intelligence (XAI) within the Intelligent and Secure SD-WAN (ISD-WAN) framework, adhering to the PRISMA 2020 guidelines. Through a rigorous analysis of thirty-two primary studies (2020-2026), we identified an architectural transition from post-hoc, management-plane explanations toward intrinsic, real-time interpretability within control and data planes. Our synthesis characterizes a fundamental trilemma between security enforcement, network performance, and computational overhead, highlighting the pivotal role of neuro-symbolic AI and blockchain as anchors for auditability and non-repudiation. We propose a multi-tiered interpretability roadmap thatAn analysis of the surveyed literature suggests a transition toward a multi-tiered interpretability roadmap, where the depth of the explanation is calibrated to the plane’s processing budget, whitch empowers sovereign entities to exercise verifiable control over autonomous information flows. By bridging the gap between algorithmic performance and strategic governance, this study establishes a structured survey and conceptual integration of emerging research framework for resilient, transparent, and technologically sovereign network infrastructures.
A governance and security-by-design framework that embeds responsibility mechanisms directly into agentic AI architectures, enabling continuous self-monitoring and alignment verification through multi-agent governance systems.
Himanshu Joshi, Shivani Shukla· Proceedings of IASEAI Confer...· 0 citations
A general three-step auditing principle is set out that locates protocol-relevant features, verifies their causal role, and diagnoses how adaptation reshapes their use, grounding it throughout publicly available interpretability and telecommunications research.
: Artificial Intelligence (AI) is a key driver of digital transformation across sectors. However, its rapid adoption introduces significant challenges in governance, security, and accountability. Modern AI systems, particularly generative and adaptive models, exhibit non-deterministic behavior, evolving data dependenci...
Faiza Tahir, Ubaid Ullah, Eric Bodden· International Conference on...· 0 citations
The study supports the use of bounded, auditable agentic control for recurring operational failure modes, and suggests that policy-gated autonomy lowers mean time to resolve (MTTR) and incident recurrence.
VenkateswaraReddy Gudise· American Journal of Technolo...· 0 citations
This paper presents a meta-synthesis that draws together four constituent studies covering adversarial machine learning, AI-powered anomaly detection in cloud environments, automated vulnerability patching by multi-agent large language model (LLM) pipelines, and the broader landscape of securing AI systems across their...
Harsh Verma· International Journal of Sci...· 0 citations
LATTICE (Layered Agentic Triad Topology for Intelligent Coordinated Execution), a governance-first architecture that reframes the authorization question from “do the authors trust this AI?” to “do they trust this architecture?”
Elias Calboreanu· Frontiers in Artificial Inte...· 2 citations
We use cookies to run the site and, with your consent, for analytics and to show ads.
See our Cookie Policy.