Sep 2026· International Journal of Scientific Research and Management· 0 citations· 38 references
Computer Science
TL;DR
This paper presents a meta-synthesis that draws together four constituent studies covering adversarial machine learning, AI-powered anomaly detection in cloud environments, automated vulnerability patching by multi-agent large language model (LLM) pipelines, and the broader landscape of securing AI systems across their lifecycle and situates their findings within the emerging literature on blockchain-enabled AI and autonomous AI agents.
Abstract
Blockchain and artificial intelligence (AI) are converging into a single infrastructural layer for securing data sharing, model integrity, and autonomous decision-making across distributed systems. This paper presents a meta-synthesis that draws together four constituent studies covering adversarial machine learning, AI-powered anomaly detection in cloud environments, automated vulnerability patching by multi-agent large language model (LLM) pipelines, and the broader landscape of securing AI systems across their lifecycle and situates their findings within the emerging literature on blockchain-enabled AI and autonomous AI agents. Each constituent study addresses a distinct point of failure in modern AI-driven security operations: the integrity of training data and model behavior, the reliability of real-time monitoring, and the trustworthiness of automated code remediation. We argue that blockchain's properties of immutability, decentralized consensus, and verifiable provenance directly address a gap common to all three: the difficulty of establishing trust in data, models, and autonomous agents that operate without a central authority. Building on real-world research on blockchain-secured data sharing, federated learning, and multi-agent coordination, we propose a layered reference architecture that couples adversarially hardened models, blockchain-anchored data provenance, AI-driven anomaly detection, and smart-contract-governed multi-agent remediation. We conclude by identifying open problems in scalability, privacy-transparency trade-offs, and the governance of autonomous agents that must be resolved before such integrated systems can be trusted in production-critical environments.
This paper proposes a blockchain-backed agentic security framework designed to safeguard the complete software development lifecycle (SDLC) while also securing the agentic AI components responsible for monitoring it. The framework coordinates a set of specialised security agents, covering source integrity, dependency a...
This article reviews the evolution and current status of using blockchain technology to improve Smart Grid security and trust. It also summarizes the main challenges faced by blockchain-based Smart Grid systems. The survey provides a clear explanation of the various risks that threaten the blockchain-based Smart Grid a...
Bacem Mbarek, A. Meddeb, M. Al-Azawi· Technologies· 0 citations
Internet of Agents (IoA) is an emerging paradigm in which autonomous Artificial Intelligence (AI) agents collaborate across organizational boundaries. Since distributed agent interactions lack a pre-established trusted central authority, blockchain, as a decentralized technology, can be integrated into IoA for decentra...
Zhao-Jin Li, Jin-Bo Wen, J. Liao et al.· IEEE Transactions on Network...· 0 citations
It is concluded that integrating FL with cross-chain blockchain technology can significantly enhance privacy, security, and collaboration among diverse AI systems, paving the way for next-generation decentralized intelligence.
Vikrant Thombare, Mahendra Sawane· International Journal of Cre...· 0 citations
What does it take to trust AI-driven HVAC optimization? Our AI Model Factory combines agents, machine learning, reinforcement learning and deterministic checks in a governed workflow designed for messy, real-world building data. The post We built an AI factory for HVAC control appeared first on GPT-Lab.
MIT News · Artificial Intelligence· news.mit.eduAug 18, 2026
A new method for surgically removing training examples from a model reveals that as datasets grow, the link between what a model learns and what it produces dissolves.
Jennifer Neville did not want to go into computer science—but that’s exactly where she landed. Neville discusses the starts and stops that led to her professional sweet spot and her work identifying “surprising failures” making it hard for AI to handle complexity. The post What AI gets wrong and what failure teaches us appeared first on Microsoft Research.