Skip to content
Open access

Comparing Learning Analytics-Supported and Traditional Mathematics Instruction across Higher Education

Aug 2026 · Journal of Educational Management and Strategy · 0 citations · 43 references

Abstract

Learning analytics (LA)-supported instruction has shown promise for improving student engagement, yet empirical evidence from infrastructure-constrained higher education systems remains limited. This study addresses that gap by pursuing two objectives: first, to compare mathematics achievement between students taught using LA-supported technology-based instruction and students taught using traditional lecture-based instruction at Samangan University, Afghanistan; and second, to examine the extent to which learning analytics engagement indicators login frequency, video time-on-task, quiz attempts, and forum participation predict students' mathematics achievement. A quasi-experimental, nonequivalent control-group, pretest–posttest design was employed with 96 second-year mathematics education students across two intact sections (experimental n = 48; control n = 48) over a 14-week term. Data were analyzed using independent-samples t-tests, analysis of covariance (ANCOVA), Pearson correlations, and multiple regression. Students in the LA-supported condition achieved significantly higher posttest scores (M = 78.6, SD = 7.4) than those in the traditional condition (M = 65.2, SD = 9.0), t(94) = 7.42, p < .001, d = 1.52, an advantage that remained significant after adjusting for pretest differences, F(1, 93) = 54.87, p < .001, partial η² = .37. Among the engagement indicators, video time-on-task (β = .34, p = .004) and quiz attempts (β = .27, p = .024) emerged as significant independent predictors, with the full set of indicators jointly accounting for 46% of the variance in posttest scores (adjusted R² = .41). Although the nonrandomized design limits causal inference, these findings extend empirical evidence on LA-supported mathematics instruction to a resource-constrained, fragile-state higher education context and indicate that behaviorally substantive engagement is a more informative predictor of achievement than platform access alone.

Read PDF

We use cookies to run the site and, with your consent, for analytics and to show ads. See our Cookie Policy.