Aug 2026· Polymer science & technology· Vol 2, pp. 836 - 854· 0 citations· 68 references
Medicine
TL;DR
PolyBench is a public benchmark platform comprising 39 literature-derived prediction tasks with 42,169 curated structure–property records covering 14,717 distinct repeat-unit structures, seven repeat-unit molecular representation types, five fingerprint families, physicochemical descriptors, and task-trained graph embeddings, and 30 supervised baseline models.
Abstract
Polymer informatics currently lacks shared benchmarks that enable reproducible comparison of property prediction methods across datasets, representations, and models. Here, we present PolyBench, a public benchmark platform comprising 39 literature-derived prediction tasks with 42,169 curated structure–property records covering 14,717 distinct repeat-unit structures, seven repeat-unit molecular representation types (five fingerprint families, physicochemical descriptors, and task-trained graph embeddings), 30 supervised baseline models (22 traditional machine-learning and 8 deep-learning methods), fixed train/test splits, and an interactive leaderboard. Across more than 10,000 supervised model evaluations spanning all 39 tasks, physicochemical descriptor-based tree ensembles emerge as strong baselines under the PolyBench protocol, though no single method achieves consistent superiority across all properties; matched repeated-split analyses on three representative tasks show that the winning configuration is stable across five seeds for the two larger tasks but not for the smallest, condition-sensitive task. The current release evaluates repeat-unit-centered polymer property prediction and does not explicitly encode higher-order factors such as molecular-weight distributions, tacticity, morphology, processing history, device architecture, or measurement protocol; tasks are therefore grouped into three provisional interpretation tiers, with condition-sensitive tasks explicitly treated as exploratory repeat-unit baselines. PolyBench is intended as a reproducible infrastructure resource for controlled method comparison, not as a complete model of chain-, sample-, or process-dependent polymer behavior, and is available at http://polybench.ciac.jl.cn (http://202.98.16.11)
Graph-based models provide the lowest errors in property prediction, retain their advantage across the evaluated training-set sizes, and remain robust to increasing repeat-unit complexity, according to the PolyBench26 benchmark.
Robert W. Learsch, Nicholas T. Liesen, Daniel S. Levine et al.· 0 citations
Machine-learning models for metal-organic frameworks (MOFs) predominantly rely on atomic structures, whereas electron-density (ED) and electrostatic-potential (ESP) fields remain underexplored as scalable learning representations. These continuous fields encode complementary spatial and electronic information relevant...
Zhao-Lin Hu, He-He Fan, Chen-Hao Rao et al.· 0 citations
This work systematically benchmarked several molecular docking tools representing all-atom models, highlighting the complementarity of AI-based approaches and methods based on physical sampling in all-atom models, in terms of their applicability range, and argues for the benefits of tighter integration.
Ao Xu, J. Lam, A. Nakano et al.· Journal of Chemical Informat...· 0 citations
A data-driven polymer informatics framework is developed by integrating molecular dynamics simulations with machine learning models to enable rapid and accurate prediction of key structural descriptors, including the radius of gyration and solvent-accessible surface area.
Lorand Gabriel Parajdi, I. Tóth, Alex-Adrian Farcas et al.· Scientific Reports· 0 citations
To address widespread data leakage and inconsistent evaluation in protein–ligand affinity prediction, we introduce PLABench, a leakage-controlled and target-centric benchmarking framework that enables standardized comparison across sequence- and structure-based models. We benchmark nine deep learning methods across bli...