The results illustrate that a late-fusion RGCN ensemble effectively captures complex gene interactions, overcoming limitations of existing models and providing a framework for future biomarker discovery.
Abstract
Glioblastoma (GBM) is a highly aggressive brain tumor with a five-year survival rate of 6.9%, attributable in substantial part to the shortage of reliable biomarkers. Competing endogenous RNA (ceRNA) and copy number variation (CNV) analyses each carry biomarker-identification potential, but existing work treats them separately and does not integrate multiple regulatory mechanisms. We therefore applied relational graph convolutional networks (RGCNs) to ceRNA and CNV knowledge graphs under a late-fusion ensemble architecture. Across 10-fold cross-validation the RGCN discriminated best among the graph architectures tested (AUCROC 0.874 ± 0.070), significantly exceeding graph convolutional, graph attention and relational attention networks. Combining the ceRNA and CNV branches at the decision level gave the best overall performance (AUCROC 0.883 ± 0.072; PR-AUC 0.208 ± 0.152) and improved on the ceRNA-only model in precision–recall terms, although that improvement does not survive correction for multiple comparisons and we therefore report it as suggestive. Screening the late-fusion ranking against the existing glioma literature left five candidates that are absent from the curated glioblastoma biomarker set and the subject of at most one prior glioma report, among them hsa-miR-203b and hsa-miR-5683, each differentially expressed by more than fivefold on a log2 scale. All five are computational predictions. Relational graph learning over a ceRNA network, combined with genomic dosage at the decision level, is thus a workable framework for biomarker prioritization, and the five loci give targeted experimental work a place to start.
This study provides a systems-level framework for identifying multi-target therapeutic strategies and supports the conceptual development of network-directed oncolytic approaches for GSC-driven GBM.
Darsh Dadhich· Clinical Cancer Research· 0 citations
This chapter provides a comprehensive technical protocol for predicting CDGs using a Graph Convolutional Network (GCN) and guides the reader through hyperparameter optimization, model training, and performance evaluation, while discussing practical considerations related to generalization, computational cost, and inter...
Renan Soares de Andrades, M. Recamonde-Mendoza· Methods in molecular biology· 0 citations
These findings support a broader multi-gene candidate signature in prostate adenocarcinoma, in which machine learning prioritized genes such as XAF1, APP, RPA3, IFIH1, UBE2D2, RSAD2, KIF2C, and PLK1, while STAT1 and PLK1 provided complementary network-level biological relevance.
H. Kurt, Sabire Kılıçarslan, M. M. Çiçekliyurt et al.· International Journal of Mol...· 0 citations
Future studies should prioritize standardized analytical pipelines, multicenter validation cohorts, experimental confirmation of predicted ceRNA mechanisms, and integration with single-cell, spatial transcriptomic, and epitranscriptomic data to improve biomarker reproducibility and accelerate their clinical translation...
N. Shah, Ayoti Chakraborty, Mursaleen Baba et al.· Network Modeling Analysis in...· 0 citations
A core set of genes, including topoisomerase II alpha, maternal embryonic leucine zipper kinase, BIRC5 and abnormal spindle-like microcephaly, which are consistently upregulated in tumours but do not significantly predict patient survival are identified.
MZT1 is a proliferation-associated marker that integrates clinical risk, transcriptional programs, cellular heterogeneity, and predictive modeling in LUAD, providing a potential framework for biomarker development and risk stratification.
Dahlak Daniel Solomon, Hui-Ru Lin, Yung-Kuo Lee et al.· Cancer Genomics & Proteomics· 0 citations
We use cookies to run the site and, with your consent, for analytics and to show ads.
See our Cookie Policy.