Skip to content
Open access

Invariant-Centered, Agent-Assisted Defense: A Security Architecture for Unbounded Attack Techniques and Unenumerable Attack Objectives

Jul 2026 · International Journal of Engineering and Modern Technology · 0 citations

TL;DR

A defensive architecture for under unbounded attack techniques and unenumerable attack objectives, where the highest-value security investments are those that hold regardless of technique, and relocates residual reactivity to a single measurable point.

Abstract

Generative AI has industrialized the attack on human judgment: voice cloning, real-time video synthesis, and hyper-personalized phishing convert social engineering from a craft into a commodity, while a residual category of attacks — those that redefine the objective itself, as ransomware once did — cannot be enumerated in advance. We propose a defensive architecture for these two conditions built on a single organizing claim: under unbounded attack techniques and unenumerable attack objectives, the highest-value security investments are those that hold regardless of technique. The architecture layers a mesh of strictly advisory AI sentinel agents, which detect cross-surface incoherence rather than synthetic content, above a deliberately simple, non-interpretive enforcement core holding a small set of hard invariants that no intelligence — human or artificial — can rewrite quickly. We give the reactive-defender objection a full treatment: the claim that any AI-era defense necessarily responds late. Our answer is that the objection is correct for every layer that must recognize attacks, and that the architecture is designed around that concession — detection layers are built for their own capture, while the invariant core does not race because it constrains consequences rather than recognizing techniques. The framework relocates residual reactivity to a single measurable point, the interval between the world changing and the invariant set catching up, and proposes that interval as the headline resilience metric. We state residual risks explicitly and outline an evaluation agenda.

Read PDF

Similar papers

Preprint Aug 2026

SysEvolve: An AI-native, safe, autonomous adversarial attack-defense co-evolutionary system

The rapid advancement of large language models (LLMs) has created a growing asymmetry in cybersecurity, where attack accelerates toward autonomous execution while defense remains predominantly human-intensive. Despite substantial prior work across cyber ranges, AI-driven attack, and AI-driven defense, this asymmetry pe...

Yuhan Meng, Shao-Fei Li, Jiong-Hao Huang et al. · 0 citations
Preprint Aug 2026

A Self-Evolving Multi-Agent Framework Defense against LLM Jailbreak Attacks

This work proposes a self-evolving test-time defense built around a persistent, cross-interaction rule memory that substantially reduces attack success rates while preserving benign utility, remains robust under an adaptive composite-wrapper attack, and does not increase over-refusal as the memory grows.

Tongshen Hu, Bryan Hooi · 0 citations
Review Aug 2026

Invisible Ink Threats: Adversarial Goals Behind Legitimate Tasks in Computer-Use Agents

I-Bench, a collection of seemingly harmless adversarial tasks targeting confidentiality and integrity attacks across three platforms, and HITLCUA, a comprehensive adversarial testing framework that integrates a real virtual machine operating system environment with isolated Docker-based web platforms, and simulates hum...

Jia-Chen Zhang, Zenghui Zhang, Kai-Wei Zhang · 1 citation
Review Aug 2026

Security of Foundation-Model-Powered Embodied Agents: Attack Surfaces, Attacks, Defenses, and Evaluation

This work presents a trust-boundary-centric survey of foundation-model-powered embodied-agent security, and shows that attack research is concentrated on multimodal perception and action interfaces, while defenses are especially concentrated on action-level and runtime protection.

Jia-Wei Liu, Jia-Cheng Guo, Tian Zhang et al. · 0 citations
Review Jul 2026

Cyber-Capable AI Agents: Vulnerabilities, Evaluation Containment, and Defensive Response

Cyber-capable AI agents combine language models with tools, memory, and execution environments to perform multi-step offensive-security tasks. Existing work separately measures cyber capability and catalogs attacks against agent components, but provides less guidance on containing a capable agent within the environment...

A. B. Siddik · 0 citations
Preprint Aug 2026

COMA: A Compositional Misleading Attack Class on Security-RAG, and a Causal Counterfactual Defense

An audit is proposed that measures the leave-one-out causal influence of each retrieved document and flags answers whose influence concentrates on low-trust documents, and proposes an audit that measures the leave-one-out causal influence of each retrieved document and flags answers whose influence concentrates on low-...

Chinmay Gondhalekar, Urjitkumar Patel · 0 citations

We use cookies to run the site and, with your consent, for analytics and to show ads. See our Cookie Policy.