Predictive Set Theory is introduced, a formal generative framework that reconstructs cognitive architecture from first principles that offers novel resolutions to classical problems such as Russell's paradox, the cognitive status of G\"{o}delian incompleteness, the grounding of negative feedback, and the comprehension of film editing.
Abstract
Predictive processing theories portray the brain as a hierarchical prediction engine that minimizes prediction error, yet they lack operational definitions for the structure of a"prediction,"the standardized response to a prediction error, and the mechanism that maintains consistency across successive updates. Bayesian cognitive science attempts to subsume all uncertainty under probabilistic belief updating, but it presupposes a closed hypothesis space and provides no generative account of how the objects over which probabilities are distributed become discrete, identifiable referents in the first place. This paper introduces Predictive Set Theory (PST), a formal generative framework that reconstructs cognitive architecture from first principles. PST anchors cognition in a minimal set of operations---a sensor formalized as an identity function, set-theoretic state refresh, and three fundamental forms of reference chains (reference, counter-reference, and semi-reference)---and rigorously derives core cognitive functions including state sequences, demand, comparison, efficiency, and finite-horizon probabilistic planning. Rather than modeling neural mechanisms, PST constitutes a design specification for any system that must maintain internal consistency while acting under incomplete information and irreversible risk. The framework offers novel resolutions to classical problems such as Russell's paradox, the cognitive status of G\"{o}delian incompleteness, the grounding of negative feedback, and the comprehension of film editing. The primary purpose of this paper is to establish, through the public academic record, the originality and completeness of the Predictive Set Theory framework.
Predictive Processing (PP) is commonly described as a mechanism sketch—an incomplete, primarily mechanistic representation of cognitive processes. While this characterization rightly emphasizes PP’s structural and causal explanatory aspects, I argue that it tends to overlook important functional and normative dimension...
This paper asks when a Bayesian description identifies a mechanism, and proposes convergent tests of specified internal, coupled, and hybrid mappings of specified internal, coupled, and hybrid mappings.
A modular state-space model in which attentional selection, predictive inference, cognitive-state evolution, intention formation, and action selection are represented by coupled mathematical mappings is proposed, which provides a white-box dynamical structure for estimation, validation, and model-based control in human...
Sven Schoonebeek, C. Cenedese, A. Jamshidnejad· arXiv.org· 0 citations
Predictive coding offers a powerful theory of cortical computation, but corresponding scalable algorithmic implementations for artificial intelligence have remained elusive. This paper introduces the Bayesian reflex, a computational framework that directly instantiates predictive coding through three pillars: belief ma...
Resistance to reality-adoption is not reducible to learning speed; it is a structural property with its own distinct failure modes, established here as a computational existence proof and nothing further.
The neural mechanisms underlying conscious perception remain contested, with global neuronal workspace theory (GNWT) and integrated information theory (IIT) offering divergent predictions about the spatiotemporal dynamics of conscious processing. The Cogitate Consortium (2025) recently conducted a large-scale adversari...
Kavindu Bandara, Elise G. Rowe, Marta I. Garrido· bioRxiv· 0 citations
We use cookies to run the site and, with your consent, for analytics and to show ads.
See our Cookie Policy.