Skip to content
#software testing Open access

Forecast register with prospective decision rules

Oct 2026 · Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)

Abstract

A register of fixed-number claims in the author's exploratory vacuum-mechanics framework, with formulas or frozen stated values, inputs, ordinary comparators, decision rules, dependencies, and a retained correction history. It contains 104 entries, including 59 live numerical candidates, 14 binary or bounded candidates, 17 conditional entries, seven historical exclusions, and one borderline classification; a separate coverage appendix records 59 claims or batches. These categories do not imply 104 independent tests. The 15 internal claim records from 22 September 2026, new draft rules from 7 October, and scoring qualifications from 8 October are kept distinct. A private freeze, draft upload or reserved DOI is not a public timestamp. Prospective scoring begins only at actual public release. All comparisons already present in the packet are historical, not successful prospective predictions. This is a transparent testing register, not a derivation or validation of a physical theory. Agreement with known measurements is not confirmation. Ordinary comparators, multiple variants, dependencies, model assumptions, unresolved ordering and covariance, and source rounding limits remain explicit. Lattice comparisons are simulations, not physical observations. The accompanying read-only checker reproduces stored arithmetic and selected scoring counterexamples; it is not an automated experimental-likelihood intake engine. Version 1.0. Public registration begins with publication of this exact version on Zenodo, not with its private freezes, draft upload or DOI reservation. The files preserve their as-prepared chronology and null registration fields; the publication event activates this version prospectively and does not turn any retained historical comparison into a successful prospective prediction. Text and mathematical data are CC BY 4.0. Python and Wolfram verification scripts are excluded from that grant and retain separate software rights as stated in SOFTWARE_RIGHTS.txt. AI-assisted research, computation, checking and editing do not constitute external peer review; Luqman Mahmood is responsible for the final claims and text.

View source

Similar papers

#computer vision Review Sep 2017

Agile Software Development Methods: Review and Analysis

This publication proposes a definition and a classification of agile software development approaches and analyses ten software development methods that can be characterized as being "agile" against the defined criterion.

P. Abrahamsson, O. Salo, Jussi Ronkainen et al. · 727 citations · ⚡54
#computer vision Jun 2008

The impact of agile practices on communication in software development

The study shows that agile practices improve both informal and formal communication, but indicates that, in larger development situations involving multiple external stakeholders, a mismatch of adequate communication mechanisms can sometimes even hinder the communication.

M. Pikkarainen, Jukka Haikara, O. Salo et al. · 401 citations · ⚡48
#machine learning Review Open access Oct 2014

Software development in startup companies: A systematic mapping study

The results indicate that software engineering work practices are chosen opportunistically, adapted and configured to provide value under the constrains imposed by the startup context.

Nicolò Paternoster, Carmine Giardino, M. Unterkalmsteiner et al. · 394 citations · ⚡54
#computer vision Review Mar 2008

Agile methods in European embedded software development organisations: a survey on the actual use and usefulness of Extreme Programming and Scrum

The results show that the embedded industry has been able to apply agile methods in its development processes and that the appreciation of the agile methods and their individual practices appears to increase once adopted and applied in practice.

O. Salo, P. Abrahamsson · 238 citations · ⚡9
#computer vision Open access Jul 2017

What happens when software developers are (un)happy

Consequences of happiness and unhappiness that are beneficial and detrimental for developers' mental well-being, the software development process, and the produced artifacts are found.

D. Graziotin, Fabian Fagerholm, Xiaofeng Wang et al. · 236 citations · ⚡13
#computer vision Open access Oct 2004

Mobile-D: an agile approach for mobile application development

The Mobile-D approach is briefly outlined here and the experiences gained from four case studies are discussed, which helped develop an agile development approach for mobile application development.

P. Abrahamsson, Antti Hanhineva, H. Hulkko et al. · 225 citations · ⚡18

Related blog posts

Microsoft Research Blog Oct 12, 2026

Simulating student learning for better AI tutoring

StudentSim is a research system for evaluating and improving AI tutoring tools before they are tested with learners. It models how individuals may engage with tutors, giving feedback to improve tutor performance across subjects like chess, writing, and mathematics. The post Simulating student learning for better AI tutoring appeared first on Microsoft Research.

MIT News · Artificial Intelligence Oct 2, 2026

Documenting the tech worker movement

Writing as a participant and researcher, PhD student JS Tan SM ’22 has co-authored a new book about the rise of tech worker protests and the employer backlash that followed.

We use cookies to run the site and, with your consent, for analytics and to show ads. See our Cookie Policy.