This study investigates the tactics behind software engineering (SE) activities by analyzing key engineering events during startup journeys and explores how entrepreneurial mindsets may be associated with SE knowledge areas and with each startup case.
Abstract
Software startups are an essential source of innovation and software-intensive products. The need to understand product development in startups and to provide relevant support are highlighted in software research. While state-of-the-art literature reveals how startups develop their software, the reasons why they adopt these activities are underexplored. This study investigates the tactics behind software engineering (SE) activities by analyzing key engineering events during startup journeys. We explore how entrepreneurial mindsets may be associated with SE knowledge areas and with each startup case. Our theoretical foundation is based on causation and effectuation models. We conducted semi-structured interviews with 40 software startups. We used two-round open coding and thematic analysis to describe and identify entrepreneurial software development patterns. Additionally, we calculated an effectuation index for each startup case. We identified 621 events merged into 32 codes of entrepreneurial logic in SE from the sample. We found a systemic occurrence of the logic in all areas of SE activities. Minimum Viable Product (MVP), Technical Debt (TD), and Customer Involvement (CI) tend to be associated with effectual logic, while testing activities at different levels are associated with causal logic. The effectuation index revealed that startups are either effectuation-driven or mixed-logics-driven. Software startups fall into two types that differentiate between how traditional SE approaches may apply to them. Effectuation seems the most relevant and essential model for explaining and developing suitable SE practices for software startups.
Seven major CSFs that drive success in globally distributed projects are revealed, highlighting a major paradigm shift within the software industry: socio-technical skills and reliable technology now carry significantly more weight than strict, traditional processes.
Chellal Mostafa, Mohammed Saber, M. Belkasmi· EPJ Web of Conferences· 0 citations
The state of the art of TDM in CSE is presented, focusing on TD causes and consequences and how to manage them continuously, as well as its causes and consequences, and how to better manage it.
L. Carvalho, J. P. Biazotto, D. Feitosa et al.· Journal of Software: Evoluti...· 0 citations
Interviews with sixteen early-adopter software professionals who integrated LLM-based tools into their day-to-day work in early to mid-2023 offer actionable implications for developers, organizations, educators, and tool designers seeking to integrate LLMs responsibly into professional software practice.
Benyamin T. Tabarsi, Heidi Reichert, Sam Gilson et al.· Empirical Software Engineeri...· 22 citations· ⚡1
There are a set of useful methods and models in work and organizational psychology that are applicable to the agile software development context of teams, but also, more generally to a larger perspective of software engineering that involves human factors.
Lucas Gren, R. L. Gren, R. Torkar et al.· 0 citations
This extended article analyzed 213 Brazilian professionals’ perceptions of the benefits and challenges of using DT in software development and compares those collected from other professionals’, serving as a guide for practitioners on the use of DT in software development.
Gabriel Kryvoruchca, R. Parizi, Lauriane Correa et al.· 0 citations
Jennifer Neville did not want to go into computer science—but that’s exactly where she landed. Neville discusses the starts and stops that led to her professional sweet spot and her work identifying “surprising failures” making it hard for AI to handle complexity. The post What AI gets wrong and what failure teaches us appeared first on Microsoft Research.
A new computational approach reveals how cells communicate to assemble into tissues. This could accelerate stem cell engineering, improve disease models, and inform therapies.
We use cookies to run the site and, with your consent, for analytics and to show ads.
See our Cookie Policy.