SciForge is a multimodal research-native AI workbench that reserves the graphical interface for human judgment while search, parsing, model routing, workflow execution, plotting, writing, and presentation generation run as modular agent-accessible services.
Abstract
Scientific work increasingly spans heterogeneous artifacts -- papers, code, datasets, scientific file formats, model outputs, figures, manuscripts, and team decisions -- yet general-purpose AI assistants rarely preserve these objects as a coherent, auditable research state. We present SciForge, a multimodal research-native AI workbench that reserves the graphical interface for human judgment while search, parsing, model routing, workflow execution, plotting, writing, and presentation generation run as modular agent-accessible services. SciForge is built around five pillars: (i) \emph{goal-scoped scientific decision governance} for \textbf{goal-oriented} research, with review gates and shared review surfaces; (ii) \emph{translate-then-reason} for \textbf{multimodal} input, routing scientific objects through domain translators before the agent reasons; (iii) \emph{evidence governance} for \textbf{auditable} traceability, linking claims to provenance chains and audit findings; (iv) \emph{collaborative team science} for \textbf{collaborative} research, enabling multi-role decision governance, with shared team workspaces planned for future releases; and (v) \emph{real-world application scenarios} for \textbf{practical} impact, demonstrated through eight end-to-end user cases, with flagship demonstrations including multi-day agentic research sprints for gene discovery, AI-guided de novo protein design, molecular optimization, and genome-to-BGC discovery. The system combines a thin interaction layer, contextual research capability patterns, an Agent Runtime and Workflow Engine, an Evidence-DAG audit sidecar and a Scientific Model Router. SciForge currently runs as a desktop application, with mobile supervision support; future releases will deepen team collaboration. The system is open-source and available at https://github.com/AGI4Sci/SciForge
Scientific papers require models to reason jointly over text, equations, figures, tables, code, and datasets while preserving the provenance of supporting evidence. Existing benchmarks typically evaluate these capabilities in isolation, leaving unclear whether multimodal models can support realistic scientific-reading...
Shenxi Wu, Yu-Hong Liu, Hao-Song Zhang et al.· 0 citations
OpenDiscoveryTrace, a public dataset of 558 complete AI scientific agent trajectories that captures how models reason, not just what they produce, is presented to support research on process-level evaluation, scientific agent auditing, and AI governance.
This work presents SciDataSailor, a framework for synthesizing tool-interactive trajectories by balancing broad exploration with targeted exploitation and presents SciDataSailor, a framework for synthesizing tool-interactive trajectories as Monte Carlo Tree Search (MCTS) with four task-specific mechanisms.
J. Rao, Yicheng Qiu, Chi Zhang et al.· arXiv.org· 1 citation
SciFigure2Code is introduced, an AI-reconstructed benchmark that instead evaluates presentation recovery: generating editable Python programs that preserve how a scientific panel is arranged and read, and provides an auditable testbed for agents that construct editable, visually faithful scientific figure presentations...
Wen-Tao Li, Yi-Bo Wu, Yi-Zhe Chen et al.· 0 citations
The AI Research Partner is presented, a full-stack MERN web platform that unifies the research-reading workflow — comprehension, synthesis, and ideation — into a single authenticated system, demonstrating that a single, prompt-engineered platform can reasonably reproduce the core stages of expert research reading withi...
C. Lokesh, A. Chakravarthy, Priya Darshini Cholla· International Journal for Re...· 0 citations
Dr. Claw is presented, an open-source workspace that wraps existing coding-agent executors in a controllable and auditable human-in-the-loop workflow rather than introducing another autonomous agent.
D. Song, Han-Rong Zhang, Dawei Liu et al.· 1 citation
We use cookies to run the site and, with your consent, for analytics and to show ads.
See our Cookie Policy.