Skip to content

PerceptionBench: Evaluating Atomic Visual Perception in Multimodal Large Language Models

Jul 2026 · arXiv.org · Vol abs/2607.24957 · 2 citations · 55 references
Computer Science

TL;DR

PerceptionBench provides a capability-level standard for measuring and diagnosing the visual perception boundaries of MLLMs, by diagnosing the earliest failure points in the responses of frontier MLLMs across 42 existing benchmarks and constructing an error taxonomy whose perception branch defines ten atomic perceptual capabilities.

Abstract

We introduce PerceptionBench, a benchmark specifically designed to evaluate the atomic visual perception capabilities of Multimodal Large Language Models (MLLMs). Existing benchmarks often fail to isolate perception: holistic evaluations conflate perceptual errors with failures in reasoning or domain knowledge, while application-driven benchmarks only cover narrow, fragmented domains shaped by heuristic designs. To address these limitations, PerceptionBench adopts a bottom-up approach: by diagnosing the earliest failure points in the responses of frontier MLLMs across 42 existing benchmarks, we construct an error taxonomy whose perception branch defines ten atomic perceptual capabilities. Guided by this taxonomy, we construct 3,000 verified questions with short, unambiguous answers, each isolating a single capability, with difficulty stemming from perception rather than reasoning or knowledge. Benchmark results across sixteen frontier MLLMs reveal that atomic perception remains largely unsolved---no model reaches 60\% accuracy, perception-related hallucination is the weakest capability on average, and similar overall scores conceal sharply divergent capability profiles. PerceptionBench thus provides a capability-level standard for measuring and diagnosing the visual perception boundaries of MLLMs.

View source

Similar papers

Jul 2026

Seeing or Knowing? Visual Context Sensitivity in Multimodal Large Language Models

For the coarse attributes the authors study, MLLMs encode the visual evidence but cannot reliably control their reliance on it, indicating that for the coarse attributes they study, MLLMs cannot reliably control their reliance on it.

Jiaang Li, Chengzu Li, Zhaochong An et al. · 0 citations
Jul 2026

See2Think: Do Multimodal Models Really Use Intermediate Visual States?

Evaluating representative proprietary and open-source multimodal models, it is found that visual reasoning is strongly model- and environment-dependent, with no single setting consistently dominating across tasks.

Siyu Yan, Zhuoran Yan, Haiying Xu et al. · 0 citations
Jul 2026

ViSTR-Bench: Can MLLMs Reason from Continuous Visual Cues in Dynamic Scenes?

The ViSTR-Bench is introduced, a novel evaluation suite designed to systematically assess whether MLLMs can perform qualitative reasoning from continuous visual cues in dynamic scenes and establishes a comprehensive four-dimensional evaluations covering Motion Perception, Spatial Relations, Outcome Prediction, and Phys...

Han Li, Si Liu, Zehao Huang et al. · 1 citation
Preprint Aug 2026

ComplexityWorld: Benchmarking Vision-Language Models on Verifiable Visual Decision Making

Vision-language models (VLMs) have made rapid progress in visual perception and increasingly support real-world tasks that depend on images. Many such tasks, however, require more than rec- ognizing what an image contains: a model must use visual evidence to make a complete decision whose parts jointly satisfy global c...

Ning-Xin Pan, Han-Yu Li, Ye-Hui Tang · 0 citations
Preprint Jul 2026

Unified Hallucination Fuzzing for Multimodal Large Language Models

This work introduces UniHall, a fine-grained dataset grounded in a unified taxonomy spanning Object, Instruction, and Knowledge dimensions, and proposes Self-Adaptive Multimodal Fuzzing (SAMF), a self-adaptive framework that employs evolutionary mutation strategies to explore the boundaries of model hallucinations.

P. Zhou, Jiajun Song, Zhiwei Tang et al. · 1 citation

We use cookies to run the site and, with your consent, for analytics and to show ads. See our Cookie Policy.