From Lotka-Volterra Dynamics to Community Assembly: Theory, Topography, and Empirical Applications

Abstract

Community assembly graphs (CAGs) summarize which species combinations can coexist and how single-species invasions drive transitions between them, encoding the pathways, alternative endpoints, and cycles that make up a community’s assembly history. Constructing CAGs from dynamical models requires methods that are both computationally tractable and faithful to the underlying ecological dynamics. However, existing methods rely on restrictive assumptions, such as global stability, that exclude alternative stable states and non-equilibrium dynamics known to occur in empirical systems. We develop a computational pipeline that constructs CAGs from any generalized Lotka–Volterra model. Building on the invasion graph framework and its connection to permanence, the pipeline verifies that community dynamics are bounded, identifies which subsets of species coexist in the sense of permanence, determines which single-species invasions are dynamically realized, and assigns each community a topographic height equal to the length of the longest assembly path leading to it. We also provide a numerical algorithm to simulate the dynamics of community assembly. We prove several general properties of the resulting graphs, including that a successful invader is never subsequently excluded and that, in the absence of assembly cycles, permanent communities can be reassembled by introducing their species one at a time in the right order. We prove that the CAG faithfully reproduces the compositional shifts seen in the numerically simulated dynamics of assembly. Applying the pipeline to three empirically based models (a New Zealand grassland, a European pasture, and a Puerto Rican ant community), we show how competition strength and mutualistic feedbacks reshape the assembly landscape and how intransitive competition generates assembly cycles. Our approach accommodates alternative stable states and non-equilibrium dynamics without requiring global stability, and it turns the long-standing landscape metaphor into a quantitative, mechanistically grounded object by resolving what “height” means. More broadly, it makes the topography of the assembly pathways measurable, providing a way to compare the historical contingency and predictability of the assembly in ecological systems.