Skip to content
Open access

An Analysis of Students’ Writing Ability in AI-Assisted Writing

Ulfa Haera Andi Anto Patak Vivit Rosmayanti
Aug 2026 · International Journal of Language, Education, and Literature · 0 citations

TL;DR

It is suggested that AI integration alone does not guarantee improved writing outcomes without corresponding foundational skill development, as students lack the foundational knowledge necessary to utilize AI tools effectively.

Abstract

The integration of Artificial Intelligence (AI) tools in writing instruction has garnered widespread attention; however, empirical evidence on the actual quality of student writing produced with AI assistance remains limited. This study aims to examine students' writing ability in AI-assisted writing products. This research employed a qualitative case study design. Data were collected through document analysis of narrative texts from five Grade XII students at SMAN 12 Sinjai, Indonesia. The analysis was conducted using Brown’s (2018) five-component framework, assessing content, organization, grammar, mechanics, and style. The findings revealed that students’ writing ability in AI-assisted contexts remains predominantly low. Only two students demonstrated Moderate ability, while the rest showed Poor ability across multiple components. Specific deficiencies included extreme repetition in content, lack of logical flow in organization, pervasive past tense errors in grammar, missing punctuation in mechanics, and severely limited vocabulary in style. The study concludes that a fundamental disconnect exists between AI use and writing quality, as students lack the foundational knowledge necessary to utilize AI tools effectively. These findings suggest that AI integration alone does not guarantee improved writing outcomes without corresponding foundational skill development.

Read PDF

Similar papers

Conference Open access Aug 2026

A Cynical Pilot Study on AI-Assisted University Student Writing Development

AI tools are frequently presented as a means to improve EFL student writing; however, the extent to which AI genuinely enhances writing skills—rather than merely composing polished final products—remains an open question. This longitudinal experiment involved 93 first-year Japanese university students completing Englis...

James S. Thomas, Melissa Huntley · 0 citations
Open access Aug 2026

STUDENTS’ PERCEPTIONS OF GRAMMARLY AS AN AI-ASSISTED WRITING TOOL IN ACADEMIC WRITING

Grammarly is a useful complementary tool that should support, not replace, instructors’ guidance in academic writing and integrating Grammarly into EFL writing instruction with appropriate pedagogical support may help improve students’ academic writing skills and promote learner autonomy.

Khanifatin, Dyah Kurniawati · 0 citations
Review Open access Jul 2026

Improving Writing Skill of Non-English Department Students Using AI

The findings indicate that the experimental group demonstrated a significant improvement in writing performance, particularly in organizing and presenting ideas clearly and coherently, and the personalized guidance provided by ChatGPT contributed to students’ learning autonomy and self-confidence.

Rachmat Ari Wibowo · 0 citations
Open access Jul 2026

Reducing Dependence on AI-Generated Text through Contextual Writing Assessment

The results demonstrated the effectiveness of the intervention, as the experimental group outperformed the control group in reducing AI-generated text dependence and exhibited substantial improvements in writing performance, originality, academic integrity, and learner agency.

Y. Daniarti, Yanuardi · 0 citations
Review Open access Jul 2026

Artificial Intelligence and the Decline of Students’ Authentic Academic Writing Skills: Evidence from a Mixed-Methods Study

The results indicate that students rely on AI to varying degrees across different stages of academic writing, and underscore the importance of developing educational practices that encourage students to use AI responsibly while maintaining intellectual ownership and academic integrity.

Muhammad Yahrif, Suharti Sirajuddin, Muhamad Khaedar · 0 citations

We use cookies to run the site and, with your consent, for analytics and to show ads. See our Cookie Policy.