Skip to content

WorkDrive: Roadwork Chain of Causation for Autonomous Driving

Jul 2026 · arXiv.org · Vol abs/2607.14727 · 0 citations
Computer Science

TL;DR

WorkDrive is proposed, a framework that constructs perception-grounded causal reasoning for work zones and aligns it with trajectory prediction and achieves progressive improvement over the trajectory-only baseline.

Abstract

Autonomous driving vision-language models (VLMs) struggle in roadwork zones, where familiar visual cues such as lane markings and permanent signs are altered or absent, and temporary devices such as cones and barriers redefine the drivable corridor. VLMs can detect these objects, but without explicit guidance they anchor their reasoning on familiar elements from pre-training and fail to connect work-zone observations to correct planning decisions. We propose WorkDrive, a framework that constructs perception-grounded causal reasoning for work zones and aligns it with trajectory prediction. An automated multitask perception pipeline extracts structured scene facts and injects them into a Chain-of-Causation (CoC) annotation pipeline, redirecting the annotator's attention to domain-specific elements. The resulting reasoning labels are used for supervised fine-tuning, followed by reinforcement learning with a single reward: consistency between lateral meta-actions and the predicted trajectory. On ROADWork, the largest public work-zone dataset, the proposed roadwork CoC reduces trajectory average displacement error (ADE) by 9.0\%, and consistency-based GRPO yields a further 3.0\%, achieving progressive improvement over the trajectory-only baseline. Code and data will be publicly released.

View source

Similar papers

Preprint Aug 2026

CAViAR: A Causal Video Dataset for Fine-Grained Accident Reasoning in Real-World Scenarios

CAViAR exposes a practical Perception--Reasoning Gap: current VLMs may recognize salient context, but do not reliably map visible agent actions to annotated rule-relevant responsibility categories in safety-critical driving scenarios, and all models degrade sharply on accident type and responsibility reasoning.

Sparsh Garg, Yi-Wen Chen, Vijay Kumar et al. · 0 citations
Preprint Sep 2026

CASCADE: A Spatio-Temporal-Causal Reasoning Representation and Dataset for Driving

This work introduces CASCADE (Causal Spatio-Temporal Analysis of Driving Environments), a structured scene representation for reasoning in driving scenes and a human-annotated dataset built on it that provides the reference for benchmarking the reasoning abilities of Physical AI models, and verifying the quality of aut...

Jenny Schmalfuss, Despoina Paschalidou, Simon Gerstenecker et al. · 0 citations
Preprint Aug 2026

RedLight-VLA: Models for traffic-rule grounding and behavioral emphasis in driving policies

RedLight-VLA, a training objective that uses expert futures and automatically generated perception targets without additional manual rule annotation, is presented, which emphasizes rare deceleration and acceleration using rotation-invariant longitudinal dynamics and a scale-preserving reduction that exactly recovers th...

B. Sudhakar, S. Sridhar, Sandipan Das et al. · 0 citations
Preprint Aug 2026

Deferred Exposure of Future Trajectories for Verifiable Reasoning in Autonomous Driving VLMs

Experimental results show that DEFT-RLVR improves AD reasoning while preserving or even enhancing general visual capabilities, and Autonomous-Driving Multiple-Choice Question (AD-MCQ) provides a flexible, scalable, and extensible foundation for future research on verifiable AD reasoning.

Zi-Xuan Huang, Yang Zhou, Kai-Xuan Wang et al. · 0 citations
Preprint Aug 2026

Inference-Time Attention Steering for Vision-Language-Action Driving Models

A bounded additive pre-softmax attention bias on the visual tokens of detector localized traffic actors on Alpamayo-R1's Qwen3-VL backbone is studied, suggesting the bias governs where the model looks rather than encoding a target behavior.

D. Prasad, Lars Ullrich, Knut Graichen · 1 citation
Jul 2026

Reasoning to Regulate: Chain-of-Thought for Traffic Rule Understanding

This work designs a scalable CoT curation pipeline that bootstraps rationales from a strong LLM through a two-round strategy and employs a VLM-based verifier to filter out incorrect cases, yielding a high-quality set of (CoT, answer) pairs.

Yueru Luo, Xu Yan, Changqing Zhou et al. · 0 citations

We use cookies to run the site and, with your consent, for analytics and to show ads. See our Cookie Policy.