Skip to content
Conference

Hybrid Interpretability and Performance Healthcare Model

Jul 2026 · International Conference on Smart Communications and Networking · pp. 1-6 · 0 citations · 19 references

Abstract

The development of AI models in healthcare AI is hampered by a central dilemma of improving both requirements of performance and interpretability in healthcare systems. Some AI models (e.g., “XGBoost (eXtreme Gradient Boosting)”) offer remarkable accuracy, but their predictions are difficult to explain to clinicians for treatment validation. The interpretability of AI models in healthcare is crucial to meet regulatory constraints (e.g., General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR), Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act (HIPAA)), which mandate traceability of automated decisions. This paradox is compounded by the limitations of existing explainability methods (SHAP, LIME), which suffer from instability and often produce explanations that are too technical for clinical workflows. The central problem, therefore, is to design a methodology that preserves predictive effectiveness while meeting the practical needs of clinical environments. We design an ontology-based healthcare model to improve both attributes of performance and interpretability.

View source

Similar papers

Open access Aug 2026

An Explainable AI-Driven Framework for Integrating Diverse Health Data to Enhance Predictive Accuracy and Clinical Interpretability

A framework through XAI to incorporate various health data sources such as electronic health records, medical imaging, laboratory reports, and wearable sensor information, which can be integrated in the context of achieving higher predictive performance in disease prediction and treatment stratification, as well as dec...

M. Aparna, S. Lahane, Dr. Bharti A. Dixit · 0 citations
Review Open access Aug 2026

Advancing Trustworthy Clinical Decision Support Through Explainable Artificial Intelligence: A Framework for Transparent, Interpretable, and Ethical Healthcare Analytics

A narrative review of the evolving image of XAI as a tool to create trustworthy clinical decision support systems and how it can be performed based on the concepts of transparency, interpretability and moral decision-making concludes that explainability is a fundamental component to the use of AI in everyday clinical p...

Rakesh Venuturumilli, Amoli Singh, Hemanshi Dhaduk et al. · 0 citations
Review Open access Aug 2026

Explainable AI in Healthcare: A Comparative Analysis of Interpretability Techniques for Clinical Decision Support Systems

It is concluded that explainable artificial intelligence improves trust, reliability, and accountability in healthcare systems and is a prerequisite for successful integration of intelligent technologies into clinical practice.

Riya Jacob K · 0 citations
Jul 2026

A Reproducible Protocol for Developing and Evaluating Explainable Artificial Intelligence Frameworks in Healthcare Analytics.

A reproducible experimental approach to developing and evaluating explainable AI systems for healthcare analytics that integrates the steps of data preprocessing, predictive modeling, interpretation generation, and evaluation into one seamless workflow that can be applied to both structured clinical data and medical im...

Yashwant Dongre, Deepali A. Godse, Prawit Chumchu et al. · 0 citations
Review Open access Aug 2026

Explainable Artificial Intelligence for Tabular Data in Healthcare: A Systematic Review of Methods, Evaluation, and Applications

This systematic review provides a comprehensive analysis of XAI methods specifically applied to tabular healthcare data for classification tasks, revealing that SHAP remains the dominant post-hoc method, achieving strong model fidelity but showing inconsistent alignment with clinical expert reasoning.

Angelower Santana-Velásquez, M. B. Salazar-Sánchez · 0 citations
Review Aug 2026

From general-purpose models to purpose-built artificial intelligence systems for health economic modeling.

This review examines current applications of LLMs to health economic modeling in terms of reproducibility, validation, adaptability, and technology readiness and concludes that near-term gains are augmenting human modelers on decomposed, verifiable sub-tasks rather than pursuing autonomous end-to-end modeling.

Attila Imre, B. Németh, Á. Jóźwiak et al. · 0 citations

We use cookies to run the site and, with your consent, for analytics and to show ads. See our Cookie Policy.